Lead Adventure Forum

Miniatures Adventure => Medieval Adventures => Topic started by: ayak333 on May 19, 2018, 05:58:57 PM

Title: Saga Age of Crusades armor inconsistencies
Post by: ayak333 on May 19, 2018, 05:58:57 PM

My Age of Crusades supplement has arrived. After my quick read through I noticed that the armor ratings for many units are extremely inconsistent. The general equipment rules, for example javelins cause -1 armor in melee or that heavy weapons cause -1 armor in melee, are inconsistently applied in the unit profile charts. Does anyone think that these are intentional or are they glaring mistakes? Seems to me they are certainly mistakes. Let me know what you think, and as I am early in the acquisition of the supplement I'll welcome all questions the wargaming community has about the supplement!

Title: Re: Saga Age of Crusades armor inconsistencies
Post by: ayak333 on May 19, 2018, 07:14:09 PM

The post is concerning the 2nd Edition.

Title: Re: Saga Age of Crusades armor inconsistencies
Post by: Ogrob on May 19, 2018, 07:29:49 PM

The Polish warriors and levies are confirmed misprinted. Don't have the book yet myself, but seen that one on Facebook.

Title: Re: Saga Age of Crusades armor inconsistencies
Post by: ayak333 on May 19, 2018, 07:47:36 PM

Ahh, Thank you. The Polish profiles were the ones that stuck out as seriously wrong.

Title: Re: Saga Age of Crusades armor inconsistencies
Post by: jauntyharrison on May 19, 2018, 10:54:26 PM

The other important errata you might have missed is that the mercenary unit Western Knights are warriors, not hearthguard.