*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 19, 2024, 07:28:30 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Donate

We Appreciate Your Support

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 1689627
  • Total Topics: 118288
  • Online Today: 681
  • Online Ever: 2235
  • (October 29, 2023, 01:32:45 AM)
Users Online

Recent

Author Topic: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?  (Read 4579 times)

Offline FierceKitty

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1723
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #30 on: October 29, 2017, 01:20:43 AM »
My Cossack army, caught by really annoyed Turks after burning Izmir to the ground in a recent campaign (I know; I was the Sultan). They have a sprinkling of Don Cossack mercenaries, but are mainly foot themselves.
The laws of probability do not apply to my dice in wargames or to my finesses in bridge.

Offline smirnoff

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 974
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #31 on: October 29, 2017, 10:35:10 AM »
Nice
Which rules are you using?

Offline M.P.

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 920
    • Barbaric Frontier
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #32 on: October 29, 2017, 07:48:50 PM »
VEry impressive :).
My roleplaying/wargaming blog: barbaricfrontier.blogspot.com

Offline M.P.

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 920
    • Barbaric Frontier
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #33 on: October 29, 2017, 07:53:14 PM »
I'm working atm on the translation for you. 

Check this blog with google translate http://kadrinazi.blogspot.com/search/label/wojna%201626-1629

This blog is run by Michał Paradowski ( the best expert on the matter you are interested in), he is a historical consultant in By fire and sword team. I cannot believe I've forgotten to mention him.

Offline smirnoff

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 974
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #34 on: October 29, 2017, 07:53:52 PM »
Excellent, thanks

That does look a great blog...but I can't get it translated, google does not seem to want to know about translating the blog itself
« Last Edit: October 29, 2017, 08:03:07 PM by smirnoff »

Offline M.P.

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 920
    • Barbaric Frontier
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #35 on: October 29, 2017, 08:30:06 PM »
Hmm maybe use firefox?


Offline M.P.

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 920
    • Barbaric Frontier
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #36 on: October 29, 2017, 08:56:49 PM »
Interesting excerpt from Eques Polonus by Szymon Starowolski (1632) :

"Jazda lekka bywa dwojaka; która używa włóczni krótkiej (rohatyny) i pancerza, nazywa się Czeremysy i druga, która albo strzelby tylko, albo łuków, albo obojga razem używa, bądź zbroję odziana bądź nie, nazywają się kozacy [...]
Czeremysy w pancerze i tarcze zbrojni, albo strzelby długiej, albo strzał, opasani szablą krzywą, mają oni włócznie na 4 łokcie długą, z boku prawego uwiązaną, którą przy spotkaniu z bliska rażą mocno nieprzyjaciela. Kozacy są dwojacy: jedni odziani w zbroję albo pancerz i szyszak, i mają dwie strzelby krótkie, i jedną długą, i szablę krzywą. Drudzy kozacy bez zbroi, w samych tylko sukniach, używają tejże strzelby"

"There are two types of light cavalry. One is equipped with spear and wears chainmail - this one is called czeremysy and the other one is equipped with long firearm or bow or both and is furnished with armor or not - this one is called kozacy [...]
The czeremysy are furnished with chainmail and shield, equipped with long firearm or bow, sabre, 2,5 meter long spear tied to the right side, which they use to attack their enemies  at a close distance.

There are two type of cossacks: first type is furnished with armor or chainmail and szyszak helmet and is equipped with two short firearms and one long as well as sabre. The other type is unarmored, only in their coats equipped with long firearm"

As you can see the description is quite a mess :p. The terminology was not standarized as well as the equipment. Light cavalry was sometimes called - cossack, tatar, wallachian, elear.

As for the czeremysy this seems to be just another name for petyhorcy. Which in turn at some point used shorter version of hussars's kopia.


As for the shields - we do not know for sure what kind of them were in use - this could be round eastern woven one, balkan asymmetrical or something else.

Note on the translation:

I've used long and short firearm for długa and krótka strzelba because it doesn't specify whether its a carabine or arquebus and pistol or krucica (sawn off arquebus)

As for armor and chainmail - in period texts zbroja (armor) designated some kind of plate armor and pancerz - chainmail.


« Last Edit: October 29, 2017, 09:31:24 PM by M.P. »

Offline FierceKitty

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1723
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #37 on: October 29, 2017, 11:22:27 PM »
Nice
Which rules are you using?

Ten More Sons! for the battle; Blood and Borscht for the campaign. Both home brew.

Wearily points out that one can wear mail, but chainmail does not exist.

Offline M.P.

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 920
    • Barbaric Frontier
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #38 on: October 30, 2017, 12:12:58 AM »
Could you elaborate on this one, I do not understand? :-)

Offline FierceKitty

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1723
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #39 on: October 30, 2017, 08:47:20 AM »
Chainmail was a word never used in the days when the stuff was worn. It was inflicted on the world hundreds of years later by an overrated Scotch novelist.

Real warriors called it mail; wargamers might do well to follow their example.

Offline Codsticker

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • *
  • Posts: 3298
    • Kodsticklerburg: A Mordheim project
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #40 on: October 30, 2017, 03:48:04 PM »
wargamers might do well to follow their example.
Why? To avoid the ire of pedants?

Offline Baron von Wreckedoften

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 871
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #41 on: October 30, 2017, 05:11:55 PM »
The Ire of Pedants would make a great place name for a fantasy scenario.
No plan survives first contact with the dice.

Offline smirnoff

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 974
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #42 on: October 30, 2017, 05:50:55 PM »
The Ire of Pedants would make a great place name for a fantasy scenario.

Hahahaha.
And it's 'Scots' Kitty, not 'Scotch'. Slàinte!

Offline FierceKitty

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1723
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #43 on: October 30, 2017, 11:17:44 PM »
Good - I'm glad someone noticed!

Offline smirnoff

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 974
Re: Polish-Lithuanian Armies 1621-29?
« Reply #44 on: October 31, 2017, 07:33:07 AM »
I've been looking for contemporary art, paintings or engravings, showing the deployment of Polish troops in this period like Matthaeus Meria's work etc.
Whilst I'm aware that most artists were not present at a battle, therefore dispositions may be inaccurate, be good to see something.
Anyone know of anything available online for the war 1626-9?

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
7 Replies
2246 Views
Last post May 10, 2013, 10:23:49 AM
by M.P.
6 Replies
2195 Views
Last post August 07, 2013, 11:27:12 PM
by The Gray Ghost
1 Replies
1439 Views
Last post August 13, 2013, 03:05:32 PM
by The Gray Ghost
0 Replies
1238 Views
Last post December 29, 2013, 10:34:11 PM
by M.P.
12 Replies
11514 Views
Last post June 10, 2015, 09:50:57 AM
by nevermore