*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
January 16, 2019, 09:06:55 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Author Topic: Saga Age of Crusades armor inconsistencies  (Read 577 times)

Offline ayak333

  • librarian
  • Posts: 155
Saga Age of Crusades armor inconsistencies
« on: May 19, 2018, 05:58:57 PM »
My Age of Crusades supplement has arrived. After my quick read through I noticed that the armor ratings for many units are extremely inconsistent. The general equipment rules, for example javelins cause -1 armor in melee or that heavy weapons cause -1 armor in melee, are inconsistently applied in the unit profile charts. Does anyone think that these are intentional or are they glaring mistakes? Seems to me they are certainly mistakes. Let me know what you think, and as I am early in the acquisition of the supplement I'll welcome all questions the wargaming community has about the supplement!

Offline ayak333

  • librarian
  • Posts: 155
Re: Saga Age of Crusades armor inconsistencies
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2018, 07:14:09 PM »
The post is concerning the 2nd Edition.

Offline Ogrob

  • mad scientist
  • Posts: 551
Re: Saga Age of Crusades armor inconsistencies
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2018, 07:29:49 PM »
The Polish warriors and levies are confirmed misprinted. Don't have the book yet myself, but seen that one on Facebook.

Offline ayak333

  • librarian
  • Posts: 155
Re: Saga Age of Crusades armor inconsistencies
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2018, 07:47:36 PM »
Ahh, Thank you. The Polish profiles were the ones that stuck out as seriously wrong.

Offline jauntyharrison

  • assistant
  • Posts: 36
Re: Saga Age of Crusades armor inconsistencies
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2018, 10:54:26 PM »
The other important errata you might have missed is that the mercenary unit Western Knights are warriors, not hearthguard.