*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 28, 2024, 10:25:27 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Donate

We Appreciate Your Support

Recent

Author Topic: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules  (Read 11935 times)

Offline PanzerKaput

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 339
Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« on: February 12, 2019, 08:47:34 PM »
Who would be interested in a new Very British Civil War skirmish level wargame, supported by one best companies out there, with a figure range from one of the best sculptors in the market, artwork from VBCW own artist? Interested want to know more?

Offline Roo

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 628
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2019, 09:03:27 PM »
Here’s your first yes 😉

Offline Cholly

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 425
  • Put the gun down.............Please?
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2019, 09:08:10 PM »
Tell us more
Love the idea of this period and have long been tempted...
Matt

Offline has.been

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 8235
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2019, 09:19:06 PM »
Show us wot u got.

Offline serran

  • Librarian
  • Posts: 128
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2019, 09:29:04 PM »
Me, me, me!

Offline Jemima Fawr

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1733
    • Jemima Fawr's Miniature Wargames Blog
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2019, 09:30:05 PM »
Oh go on then.  If I must...
Suffering from insomnia?  Too much excitement in your life?  Jemima Fawr's Miniature Wargames Blog might be just the solution you've been looking for: www.jemimafawr.co.uk

Offline TheBlackCrane

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 774
    • Tales of the Black Crane
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2019, 09:33:46 PM »
Yep. I missed the original and by the time I cottoned onto it it felt like I'd forever be playing catchup, so this is most intriguing

Offline shedman

  • Assistant
  • Posts: 34
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2019, 09:49:07 PM »
As long as it's not an Osprey ruleset rehash then yes

Offline PanzerKaput

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 339
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2019, 11:08:36 PM »
Its not an Osprey production

Offline Kommando_J

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1217
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2019, 11:15:20 PM »
I would like to know more as I have been steadily collecting vbcw for a few years but have yet to find a ruleset that really pops out to me.





Offline Adam

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 213
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #10 on: February 13, 2019, 12:02:15 AM »
I'm very interested, mate. I've been getting drawn back into VBCW over the last month or so.

Offline Poctaman

  • Assistant
  • Posts: 25
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #11 on: February 13, 2019, 07:27:18 AM »
Sounds interesting. Count me in.
Dulce bellum inexpertis.

Offline the commissar

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 406
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #12 on: February 13, 2019, 08:01:41 AM »
Very interesting - when will you be able to tell us more?

Offline leadboy

  • Librarian
  • Posts: 194
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #13 on: February 13, 2019, 09:03:59 AM »
I'd be in. Artwork and figures would be v. attractive irrespective of the rules. As for the rules, query the concept of "skirmish", which I guess means individual basing and a very small number of figures. Of course that has it's welcome place, but may well be overcatered for already. The rules I would be really interested in would be for platoon/battalion/battlegroup level with between 60 and 120 figures aside, with a bit of "armour" and a bit of "artillery" thrown in. Just my tuppenceworth.

Offline nicknorthstar

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • *
  • Posts: 2647
Re: Who Fancies a New Set of VBCW Rules
« Reply #14 on: February 13, 2019, 09:38:58 AM »
I'd say it's Warbanner or Empress. Who's it gonna be? Or am I way off the mark?