*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 26, 2024, 05:29:32 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Donate

We Appreciate Your Support

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 1690801
  • Total Topics: 118351
  • Online Today: 947
  • Online Ever: 2235
  • (October 29, 2023, 01:32:45 AM)
Users Online

Recent

Author Topic: Claymore Castings, really that good?  (Read 2399 times)

Offline Antonio J Carrasco

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Mad Scientist
  • *
  • Posts: 974
Re: Claymore Castings, really that good?
« Reply #15 on: August 31, 2019, 12:24:15 PM »
Cast and sculpture are top. I am not that fond of all the poses, though. Some of them are too "dynamic" for my tastes.

Offline Rommel

  • Librarian
  • Posts: 185
Re: Claymore Castings, really that good?
« Reply #16 on: August 31, 2019, 12:35:48 PM »
I don’t have them, but it is the same sculpter as Boot Hill miniatures, so top! Mathew Bickley i think.

Online Atheling

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 11938
    • Just Add Water Wargaming Blog
Re: Claymore Castings, really that good?
« Reply #17 on: August 31, 2019, 01:43:48 PM »

Offline westwaller

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 775
Re: Claymore Castings, really that good?
« Reply #18 on: August 31, 2019, 04:14:06 PM »
Yes! Yes and yes! Bickley's sculpts are great. The owners are great to deal with too.

Offline Tonhel

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 572
Re: Claymore Castings, really that good?
« Reply #19 on: August 31, 2019, 08:11:33 PM »
Their early HYW range is fantastic. Imo Matthew Bickley is extremly good. The casting is also of a very high quality.