Donate to the Lead Adventure Forum to keep it alive!
From a personal perspective I want a few of these for an Iraq campaign I am planning.
Rather nice. Santa’s elves have been busy!Personally speaking, I’d prefer it if the track guards were easier to remove. Relativelu common sight in the Vietnam use of the T-54/55 to see them removed or torn away. Spare track links on the guards is a bit too specific for me, it’s not a standard place for them. I’d prefer that any stowage was separate, allowing individual placement.
Personally speaking, I’d prefer it if the track guards were easier to remove. Relativelu common sight in the Vietnam use of the T-54/55 to see them removed or torn away.
I’d prefer that any stowage was separate, allowing individual placement.
Personally speaking, I’d prefer it if the track guards were easier to remove. Relativelu common sight in the Vietnam use of the T-54/55 to see them removed or torn away. Spare track links on the guards is a bit too specific for me, it’s not a standard place for them. I’d prefer that any stowage was separate, allowing individual placement.
The spare links are separate.The front and rear fenders are also separate. The track guards along the hull are part of the hull.
What was the problem with the m48 track guards?
Ah ok. New models have better locating bits. There are built in alignment features now.