*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 29, 2024, 08:03:22 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Donate

We Appreciate Your Support

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 1686618
  • Total Topics: 118114
  • Online Today: 777
  • Online Ever: 2235
  • (October 29, 2023, 12:32:45 AM)
Users Online

Recent

Author Topic: Rubicon Vietnam  (Read 4523 times)

Offline Shahbahraz

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1425
    • A Lead Odyssey
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #15 on: July 03, 2020, 07:27:18 PM »
Well, I've got a Kuwaiti Armoured Regiment on the painting table to field against my Iraqis. So sometimes it can be fun to play the underdog ;)

I think any major conflict in which you suffer more armour losses from your allies than your enemies can be considered extremely one-sided. Is that true of Kuwait vs Iraq?

And believe me - I always play the underdog... Austrians in Nappies and 7YW, Jacobites in 1745, anyone except Rome..
Wargaming since the dark ages...

---https://aleadodyssey.blogspot.com/---

Offline Wyrmalla

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • *
  • Posts: 2296
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #16 on: July 10, 2020, 08:28:14 AM »
Now with vehicles. Rubicon Models' Facebook page has more pictures.

Quote
Our first "official" project that is absolutely not WW2-related... the Soviet BTR-60P Armoured Personnel Carrier (APC).

This Cold War project will cover both the BTR-60P and BTR-60PA, and we are also looking into a BTR-60PB upgrade as well.  More detail images on our official FB page.  What do you think?



« Last Edit: July 10, 2020, 08:31:18 AM by Wyrmalla »

Offline Ultravanillasmurf

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 9305
    • Ultravanillasmurf
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2020, 01:08:19 PM »
Good spot.
It is also on their forum.
I asked about the non cabriolet option.

Offline carlos marighela

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10762
  • Flamenguista até morrer.
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2020, 04:16:01 PM »
Not saying it isn’t a good thing but I really question whether they have thought things through. I doubt there’s a huge modelling base for 1/56 modern vehicles, a niche within a niche within a niche which suggests the appetite is resumed to live in wargaming world, another niche within a niche.

The problem with doing BTR-60 P and PA models is that no gaming company produces 28mm miniatures for which they would be suitable companions. There’s not much in the way of 1960s Soviet or Middle Eastern client forces out there to my knowledge. A BTR-60 PB would have much greater potential but even there the ranges of miniatures are still pretty thin.

Given they are about to launch a Vietnam range I would have thought starting with Vietnam vehicles would be smarter. BTR-60s were not a notable feature of that conflict.
Em dezembro de '81
Botou os ingleses na roda
3 a 0 no Liverpool
Ficou marcado na história
E no Rio não tem outro igual
Só o Flamengo é campeão mundial
E agora seu povo
Pede o mundo de novo

Offline Wyrmalla

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • *
  • Posts: 2296
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #19 on: July 10, 2020, 09:31:10 PM »
I believe they're dipping their toes into doing a wider Cold War range. Or at least vehicles capable of covering multiple wars. So whilst the BTR-60 may have only seen use in Vietnam in small number (I wouldn't know myself), it may be more viable for them due to its wider use as far as what customers will use it for.

That modern gaming errs towards 1/50th may be more of a holdover of the lack of wargaming companies having invested in it. 1/56th was the new thing in WWII gaming back in the day and now its taken over. Before then folk were using the larger scale models as that's what the "proper" model companies were making, and the wargaming companies just followed on to be compatible with them.

So whilst its niche, its not entirely so. There are a few companies out there doing Cold War stuff in 1/56th. Though most of the other companies are doing 1/50th, which likely isn't going to change now.

Personally I've ditched my 1/50th stuff and moved to 1/56th for modern gaming. I only used 1/50th as that's what was available. Now with 3D printing that's become a moot issue. I'd welcome a company like Rubicon making good quality kits, as it'd mean not having to deal with all the oversized compnents which come out of the other companies for conversion work. Just hopefully there's some sort of after market industry for them - though yeah, the post-wwii space is a niche, so that's unlikely.


Offline carlos marighela

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10762
  • Flamenguista até morrer.
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #20 on: July 10, 2020, 11:39:15 PM »
Scale isn’t the issue for me. I have 1/48, 1/50, 1/56 models though I usually filter scale by type or conflict so as to avoid the issue of size disparity amongst models of the same vehicle. My 1960s Brits use 1/56 scout cars and tanks but I’ve been buying 1/50 vehicles for Vietnam.

My question is really whether a BTR-60 in its early form is a sensible way to dip ones toe. They didn’t see a lot of action, they aren’t compatible with the bigger project Rubicon has just launched (Vietnam) and nobody makes ranges of toy soldiers that would be compatible. A BTR-60 PB makes far more sense as the baseline model as it was the principle export model and they could make some variants from that, like the PU or even a Romanian TAB-71.

Look, I’ll probably buy one as I like their kits and I like the BTR-60 as a vehicle but it seems a strange choice, inspired by whimsy or possibly poor research.

Offline Splod

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 676
  • Flittering from one project to another
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #21 on: July 11, 2020, 12:29:18 AM »
I mean, if I was doing my Arab Israeli wars in 28mm I guess this would be a fantastic buy. 1/56 is a common WW2 scale and there'd be plenty of crossover between WW2 and the AIW.

But then I went with 1/72 for that, didn't I  ;)

Offline Wyrmalla

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • *
  • Posts: 2296
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #22 on: July 11, 2020, 01:00:46 AM »
I suspect that the early model BTR-60 was an excuse to make a vehicle with an interior, following the Tiger II. Perhaps to show off as a start to this new range. It seen use in that conflict, so they can try and get away with it.

Why the BTR-60 specifically is indeed a question, though the company maybe have a business plan involved where they're considering later conflicts and want to have a kit which is viable for them. As opposed to making something older like the BTR-40 that is. Saying that, its difficult for me to think of a Soviet vehicle used in Vietnam which wouldn't be used for decades after it.

I totally agree that Rubicon do fall into the realms of whimsy at times. More so for projects done by new starts though. Maybe they just think making one of these will sell better than a BTR-40 or something which other companies are already doing in resin (products which themselves are already niche compared to their WWII line which they can get away with dublicating kits available from other companies - as Rubicon's quality's generally better).

I suppose if not the BTR-60 what else could they have came out with for the Communist forces?


Offline carlos marighela

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10762
  • Flamenguista até morrer.
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #23 on: July 11, 2020, 02:03:44 AM »
Well, if they wanted to do something for Vietnam then they should have looked at a BTR-50. Options for open and closed and even an AA variant or two. Not much used but certainly more so than the BTR-60, the Vietnamese didn’t have any of those until well after the war ended and I doubt there’s a huge market for Vietnam’s Vietnam, the counter insurgency war in Cambodia post the invasion. For the 1978 invasion itself the Vietnamese mostly used ex ARVN M113s as APCs.

Vehicles are marginal for PAVN forces save for 1972 and 1975. The obvious choices are T-54 and PT-76 tanks with the main APC type for both being Chinese Type 63s I doubt we will be seeing the latter, which is vaguely ironic as Rubicon are, I believe, Hong Kong based.

Offline Ash

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1943
    • Ashley Straw.com
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #24 on: July 11, 2020, 10:02:24 AM »
I'd like a BTR-152...

Offline carlos marighela

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10762
  • Flamenguista até morrer.
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #25 on: July 11, 2020, 10:16:16 AM »
Company B do one in resin don’t they?

Offline Ewart

  • Assistant
  • Posts: 35
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #26 on: July 11, 2020, 08:11:34 PM »
Plastic M113. That would be a market winner. And T-54/55's in plastic. That would sell well I reckon.

Although I will be getting one of these add as filler in any African Imagination and neo-future sci-fi.

Offline Splod

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 676
  • Flittering from one project to another
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #27 on: July 11, 2020, 09:28:27 PM »
I'd like a BTR-152...

That would be a winner for me! It definitely was a more common sight during the Vietnam War than the BTR-60.

I find some of these companies often choose an 'odd' product for their first release. If the focus is on Vietnam, I would have thought the BTR-40 or BTR-50 would have been a more appropriate choice? It also would have tied in well to the WWW2 and 'early Cold War' gamers. If they're looking for a kit that would be attractive across as many periods as possible, something like the BMP-1 or BRDM-2 would probably have been a better starting point.

Offline Wyrmalla

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • *
  • Posts: 2296
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #28 on: July 12, 2020, 05:11:27 AM »
A plastic T-54/55 in particular would be useful for so many conversions. I've been hacking up resin T-54s to turn into T-44s, which isn't easy... I strongly suspect we'll be seeing one of those out of Rubicon if they're invested in a Vietnam range. :D


Offline carlos marighela

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10762
  • Flamenguista até morrer.
Re: Rubicon Vietnam
« Reply #29 on: July 12, 2020, 07:09:17 AM »
Your jump to 1/56 is particularly poorly timed then. Tamiya have just released a 1/48 T-55 and Hobby Boss do a remarkably detailed (full interior) but cheap T-34/85 in the same scale. All the makings of a T-44 for around £30 or less and no nasty resin to chop or sand.

As in comedy, timing is everything.  :D

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
3 Replies
1860 Views
Last post May 26, 2016, 08:19:47 PM
by carlos marighela
39 Replies
6719 Views
Last post February 11, 2022, 05:51:31 PM
by Mick_in_Switzerland
9 Replies
1515 Views
Last post July 30, 2022, 10:08:25 PM
by Ursus Maior
10 Replies
1289 Views
Last post July 23, 2023, 05:41:29 PM
by CapnJim
14 Replies
1584 Views
Last post December 30, 2023, 08:49:34 PM
by eddieazrael