*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 19, 2024, 02:33:46 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Donate

We Appreciate Your Support

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 1685047
  • Total Topics: 118007
  • Online Today: 766
  • Online Ever: 2235
  • (October 29, 2023, 12:32:45 AM)
Users Online

Recent

Author Topic: Rifle Platoon MG Sqd.: Tripod Standard Issue?  (Read 2145 times)

Offline AngusPodgorny1969

  • Bookworm
  • Posts: 61
Rifle Platoon MG Sqd.: Tripod Standard Issue?
« on: December 31, 2013, 08:24:33 PM »
Does the weapons squad of a typical rifle platoon routinely carry around their tripods so they're ready to use as needed?

Or are the tripods considered too bulky to lug around routinely and issued only when they're expected to be needed, for example in a static defense situation?


Offline commissarmoody

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 8669
    • Moodys Adventures
Re: Rifle Platoon MG Sqd.: Tripod Standard Issue?
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2013, 09:08:50 PM »
From my experience lugging the tripods around for a 240B in Afghanistan, I can tell you that yes. The US army requires us to take the tripods when dismounted.  :D
"Peace" is that brief, glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.

- Anonymous

Offline georgec

  • Librarian
  • Posts: 140
Re: Rifle Platoon MG Sqd.: Tripod Standard Issue?
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2013, 09:15:29 PM »
GPMG type weapons (MG34/42, MAG, M60, UK GPMG) usually have tripods issued to specialist MG platoons eg German WW2, UK today, US in Vietnam).  I do know that back in the 80s the British Army only had the GPMG at squad level but still had 2 tripods available per 3 guns in a platoon.  The use of these SFMGs was pre planned; either as part of a deliberate defence or as a Fire Supprt Group shooting in an attack. So I wouldn't rule out a platoon having a tripod along with it, but I doubt it would be a normal occurrence.  If nothing else, they are helluva bulky and heavy, need nearly the whole section to carry sufficient ammo to use the SF role proper and take far too long to set up during a firefight. Moreover, they are probably a unwieldy liability at under 200m unless dug in in overlapping defensive fields of fire, and you just can't take cover with them like lying down behind a bipod mounted weapon?

Commissarmoody, of course, shows the exception that proves the rule :). Afghanistan has very long engagement ranges over the mountain terrain so a tripod is really useful.  If you were going out on a long foot patrol then 'nipping back' to the QM wagon for the tripod is not an option.  Commissarmoody may also confirm that the USArmy uses its platoon weapons in a fire  support section as well as the SAW at section level, and the USMC has them as company- level weapons.  Conversely, I doubt a platoon on a street patrol in Iraq would ha e sed them unless they were planning to set up a defensive position at some point
« Last Edit: December 31, 2013, 09:24:47 PM by georgec »

Offline carlos marighela

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10737
  • Flamenguista até morrer.
Re: Rifle Platoon MG Sqd.: Tripod Standard Issue?
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2013, 09:32:53 PM »
What do you mean by a typical rifle platoon? Not many rifle platoons have weapons squads except in the US model and those that employ US organisation and/ or doctrine.

In British/ Commonwealth armies, tripods and the associated kit, sights, aiming posts, etc are usually held well abovevthe platoon level. In the British model tripods and the associated kit were held at company level in the 1960s and 70s after the abolition of the MG platoon. In the early 1980s IiRC the British reintroduced an SFMG platoon within the battalion. Australia had something similar, at various times known as SFMG or Direct Fire platoon and part of Support Company. I never saw tripods issued below that level as they wete held by SFMG Platoon along with the C2 sighting units and aimimg stakes. For defence at platoon level, th gun was simply staked on fixed lines and the bipod employed.

IIRc the US model holds a certain number of kits at Coy level. I'm fairly certain I've seen photos of the tripod for the MAG 58 being used by rifle platoons in the Brazilian Army, wich broadly follows US organisational doctrine.
.
« Last Edit: December 31, 2013, 09:34:41 PM by carlos marighela »
Em dezembro de '81
Botou os ingleses na roda
3 a 0 no Liverpool
Ficou marcado na história
E no Rio não tem outro igual
Só o Flamengo é campeão mundial
E agora seu povo
Pede o mundo de novo

Offline AngusPodgorny1969

  • Bookworm
  • Posts: 61
Re: Rifle Platoon MG Sqd.: Tripod Standard Issue?
« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2014, 01:42:29 AM »
From my experience lugging the tripods around for a 240B in Afghanistan, I can tell you that yes. The US army requires us to take the tripods when dismounted.  :D

Thanks Moody!

Offline AngusPodgorny1969

  • Bookworm
  • Posts: 61
Re: Rifle Platoon MG Sqd.: Tripod Standard Issue?
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2014, 01:45:16 AM »
What do you mean by a typical rifle platoon? Not many rifle platoons have weapons squads except in the US model and those that employ US organisation and/ or doctrine.
.

That sort of specialized MG squad is the issue here rather than a GPMG assigned to a rifle squad.

Offline commissarmoody

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 8669
    • Moodys Adventures
Re: Rifle Platoon MG Sqd.: Tripod Standard Issue?
« Reply #6 on: January 01, 2014, 02:14:03 AM »
No problem dude

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
9 Replies
3086 Views
Last post September 30, 2010, 12:19:35 PM
by The_Beast
4 Replies
1531 Views
Last post March 09, 2012, 10:47:22 PM
by Conquistador
39 Replies
6173 Views
Last post July 17, 2013, 11:27:47 AM
by CyberAlien312
1 Replies
1695 Views
Last post August 07, 2014, 02:00:57 PM
by Khurasan Miniatures
151 Replies
30947 Views
Last post February 17, 2022, 04:35:34 PM
by zirrian