*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 25, 2024, 02:12:30 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Donate

We Appreciate Your Support

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 1690584
  • Total Topics: 118338
  • Online Today: 822
  • Online Ever: 2235
  • (October 29, 2023, 01:32:45 AM)
Users Online

Recent

Author Topic: Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures  (Read 4460 times)

Offline argsilverson

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2580
Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures
« on: September 20, 2008, 08:38:57 PM »
Dear All,

Tiger miniatures has released some new miniaturesm this time with regular Afghans both in beehive and turcoman hat styles.

Take a look here:

http://tigerminiatures.co.uk/page9.htm

argsilverson

Offline Hammers

  • Amateur papiermachiéer
  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Elder God
  • *
  • Posts: 16093
  • Workbench and Pulp Moderator
Re: Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2008, 09:38:36 PM »
How does Tiger miniatures compare in style, quality and size to Renegade, Copplestone, Brigade Games and Artizan ( which all, in my mind, sit well next to each other).

Offline argsilverson

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2580
Re: Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures
« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2008, 10:27:49 PM »
How does Tiger miniatures compare in style, quality and size to Renegade, Copplestone, Brigade Games and Artizan ( which all, in my mind, sit well next to each other).

See: http://tigerminiatures.co.uk/index.htm

Scroll down to the page  and you will find a comparison photo.
Generally speaking:
Copplestone (depending on the range) are a little higher.
Foundry are smaller
Artizan I do not know since I do not have any. I am expecting some and I will advise asap.
Brigade: I compared my Greek general on foot (tiger) again von Lettow (brigade) and I found them compatible in size and style. In fact I do you have a lot of colonials from Brigade and few from Tiger, but I do mix them in the same unit and I am happy.

Sorry no photos. I still have not tried to learn to photo my figures.

 

Offline Hammers

  • Amateur papiermachiéer
  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Elder God
  • *
  • Posts: 16093
  • Workbench and Pulp Moderator
Re: Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2008, 10:56:41 PM »
That's not too shabby!

Offline VonAkers

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 334
Re: Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2008, 06:53:06 AM »
Hi
The figures do look very nice indeed ,good work Tiger!!!!!!
However in regards to the Colour picture ... lol ...perhaps not a good idea in future to make a obvious real effort in making a new line  ,of sensational figures...And then get your 2 year old son drink on cider and tell him to paint up some figures for the web site... lol
Regards

Offline VonAkers

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 334
Re: Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2008, 06:57:58 AM »
Hi Again
Dear Tiger in future please  send me the samples ,which I will paint for free and return to you.
A pathetic paint job can still make a Perry  figure or a Tiger figure look bad.
Regards

Offline oxiana

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1069
Re: Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2008, 09:57:24 AM »
Nice sculpts, but I have a big problem with the Turcomans. Why go to all the trouble of sculpting such nice minis, when you top them off with big bushy beards? Turcomans (ie Turkmen) don't grow big beards, because they can't - they are an Asiatic ethnic group in the same way that the Mongols are. You wouldn't see a mini of Genghis Khan with a big beard, so you shouldn't see one of a northern Afghan. This goes the same for Uzbeks - Afghanistan is a patchwork of ethnicities, but the default state for minis is to whack on a big beard Taliban style. I don't understand why, it's a real shame. Right now, you'd need to do a fair bit of converting to get these minis is a state to use. Sorry, Tiger.

Offline argsilverson

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2580
Re: Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures
« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2008, 10:05:36 AM »
Nice sculpts, but I have a big problem with the Turcomans. Why go to all the trouble of sculpting such nice minis, when you top them off with big bushy beards? Turcomans (ie Turkmen) don't grow big beards, because they can't - they are an Asiatic ethnic group in the same way that the Mongols are. You wouldn't see a mini of Genghis Khan with a big beard, so you shouldn't see one of a northern Afghan. This goes the same for Uzbeks - Afghanistan is a patchwork of ethnicities, but the default state for minis is to whack on a big beard Taliban style. I don't understand why, it's a real shame. Right now, you'd need to do a fair bit of converting to get these minis is a state to use. Sorry, Tiger.

You forgot that these people do hire a large number of mercenaries from other tribes.
However these people have "a Turcoman" uniform and they are not Turcomans. You may use them as Persians [Their regular army had same uniforms] or even Russians in Turcoman uniform]

By the way: These figures are suitable for BoB and Pulp games.
Should we cross post this thread to the other boards as well?

Offline argsilverson

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2580
Re: Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures
« Reply #8 on: September 22, 2008, 10:45:02 PM »
I do not know whether Turcomans have or have not the capability to grow beards but see the photo:

http://uskowioniran.blogspot.com/2008/05/irans-military-minorities-show.html

It has also an inspiring paint idea!

Offline Hammers

  • Amateur papiermachiéer
  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Elder God
  • *
  • Posts: 16093
  • Workbench and Pulp Moderator
Re: Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2008, 09:51:21 AM »
Can anyone direct me to a historical source to why there are Afghans in turkish outfit? I know there was some influx of hand weapons from turkey to Afghanistan during and after the great war but I have not heard of uniforms or heavier equipment than Mausers.

Offline Plynkes

  • The Royal Bastard
  • Moderator
  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10225
  • I killed Mufasa!
    • http://misterplynkes.blogspot.com/
Re: Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2008, 10:14:02 AM »
Are those Turkish uniforms? I'm not an expert on the subject but to me they look similar to the uniforms the Afghan regular army had been wearing since the 1860s/1870s (I forget exactly when Sher Ali's regular army came about). Those were based on British uniforms of the time, and some may have even been old Indian surplus.
With Cat-Like Tread
Upon our prey we steal...

Offline Hammers

  • Amateur papiermachiéer
  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Elder God
  • *
  • Posts: 16093
  • Workbench and Pulp Moderator
Re: Afghan regulars - new minis from Tiger miniatures
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2008, 10:19:46 AM »
Ah! Mystery solved. I was confusing turcoman with ottoman.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
8 Replies
9277 Views
Last post April 01, 2012, 05:21:01 PM
by H.M.Stanley
8 Replies
4706 Views
Last post March 05, 2015, 07:58:47 AM
by Atheling
33 Replies
10254 Views
Last post March 17, 2015, 10:18:00 PM
by Harry Faversham
27 Replies
3168 Views
Last post July 23, 2020, 11:14:18 AM
by PhilH
4 Replies
873 Views
Last post May 17, 2022, 07:35:28 PM
by AlexM