Lead Adventure Forum

Miniatures Adventure => Future Wars => Topic started by: vodkafan on 30 December 2017, 11:55:34 PM

Title: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: vodkafan on 30 December 2017, 11:55:34 PM
A simple kitbash of a 1/35 Panzer 1F tank and a GW Leman Russ turret... not yet painted, any suggestions? The original turret is going to get used on a GW Chimera , if I can pick one up cheap.


(https://s26.postimg.org/66b7r7rmh/hybrid_tank0001.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Kit with original turret. I left a couple of fiddly bits off, as it's now a gaming model


(https://s26.postimg.org/pbeh0ze09/hybrid_tank0002.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Both turrets side by side


(https://s26.postimg.org/y6fbbjsix/hybrid_tank0004.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Oh yeah!


(https://s26.postimg.org/3ozgk0kll/hybrid_tank0005.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Comments welcome
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: Predatorpt on 31 December 2017, 01:26:19 AM
Is that the Hobbyboss Panzer I? It looks way better than the original LR.
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: vodkafan on 31 December 2017, 02:51:42 AM
Is that the Hobbyboss Panzer I? It looks way better than the original LR.

I cannot now remember, having thrown the box away. It was a plastic 1/35 kit I ordered from my local model shop, about 5 years ago now. I do remember that the separate plastic track links were a real pain.
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: vodkafan on 31 December 2017, 02:52:51 AM
it looks the part. In fact I would have thought it was a forge world variant on first glance

Thanks Scurv!
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: Predatorpt on 31 December 2017, 03:01:38 AM
I cannot now remember, having thrown the box away. It was a plastic 1/35 kit I ordered from my local model shop, about 5 years ago now. I do remember that the separate plastic track links were a real pain.

Ok, Hobbyboss for sure, lol. Hate their track links.

And if you want to do Traitor Guard, you can use it as a AT70 Reaver Battle Tank ;)

http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/AT70_Reaver_Battle_Tank
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: flatpack on 31 December 2017, 07:52:08 AM
Very nice, and well done with the posting.
Was the posting easy enough ?
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: vodkafan on 31 December 2017, 08:25:51 AM
Very nice, and well done with the posting.
Was the posting easy enough ?

Yep, Postimage was very easy thanks!
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: vodkafan on 31 December 2017, 08:29:13 AM
Ok, Hobbyboss for sure, lol. Hate their track links.

And if you want to do Traitor Guard, you can use it as a AT70 Reaver Battle Tank ;)

http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/AT70_Reaver_Battle_Tank

Haha you lost me at Traitor Guard...I do Rogue Stars so it will be a Space Jannissary tank on some colony world.
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: Ultravanillasmurf on 31 December 2017, 09:06:33 AM
Nice conversion. Removing the track guards alters the shape well.
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: von der Tann on 31 December 2017, 09:20:58 AM
Nice conversion. Removing the track guards alters the shape well.

That's the way the tank looks. No removing done I think.
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: YPU on 31 December 2017, 10:53:53 AM
Had to look it up myself but you are right, that break in the track guard is standard on the 1F and does indeed make it look very 40K ish, the turret fits in there nicely as well, really brings it all together as a MBT.

Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: vodkafan on 31 December 2017, 10:56:40 AM
That's the way the tank looks. No removing done I think.

von der Tann is quite right. I didn't change anything on the hull. The gap in the track guards is for the circular side escape hatches. If the tank is a bit unfamiliar it is because in real life only 30 were made. They were an infantry tank version of the panzer I with very thick 80mm armour
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: clanmac on 31 December 2017, 10:57:50 AM
Very nicely done and really looks the part. The turret goes extremely well with that hull.
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: vodkafan on 31 December 2017, 10:58:45 AM
Had to look it up myself but you are right, that break in the track guard is standard on the 1F and does indeed make it look very 40K ish, the turret fits in there nicely as well, really brings it all together as a MBT.



You want one too now, don't you?  ;)
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: Ultravanillasmurf on 31 December 2017, 11:03:54 AM
That's the way the tank looks. No removing done I think.
Ah, I am working on a IB which of course is very different.
http://leadadventureforum.com/index.php?topic=97132.msg1324056#msg1324056 (http://leadadventureforum.com/index.php?topic=97132.msg1324056#msg1324056)
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: YPU on 31 December 2017, 11:11:15 AM
You want one too now, don't you?  ;)

Nah, I've been working on something else.  :D

(https://i.imgur.com/JP2OfWS.jpg)
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: vodkafan on 31 December 2017, 11:22:15 AM
OOooh  ;D
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: has.been on 31 December 2017, 02:18:22 PM
Very nice work, I don't want one, but I can see it as a very nice centre piece in a Rogue Star game.
Possible scenarios:- Get the power pack; Make the weapons work; Place a detonator on it, etc. etc.
Title: Re: NOT 40K kitbash (first try with new photo host)
Post by: tomrommel1 on 02 January 2018, 07:55:44 AM
very nice conversion ! Now put some paint on  ;)