Lead Adventure Forum

Miniatures Adventure => The Conflicts that came in from the Cold => Topic started by: Cholmondely Percival IV on April 18, 2025, 07:53:18 PM

Title: Warfare
Post by: Cholmondely Percival IV on April 18, 2025, 07:53:18 PM
Some may have already seen the trailer - or even the film itself - but the following review may nevertheless be of interest:

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/apr/15/warfare-realistic-war-film

In case it needs stressing, my reason for bringing attention to this is not to invite debate on the rights and wrongs of the Iraq War - though these are inevitably raised in the review - but because of the film's attempt to depict the soldiers' experience
 in the midst of combat as accurately as possible.
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: Inkpaduta on April 18, 2025, 07:57:54 PM
Heard it was based on personal accounts. That could help things.
Would likely watch it on streaming.
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: Rick on April 18, 2025, 09:14:15 PM
Heard it was based on personal accounts. That could help things.
Would likely watch it on streaming.
It's written and directed by the central character, with additional material by the men in his unit, so it seems to stand a good chance at an accurate account. Some of the so-called 'based on personal accounts' films have been so heavily altered and 'sexed up' by studios that they bear little relation to what happened. This might definitely be one to watch.
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: Aethelflaeda was framed on April 18, 2025, 09:22:50 PM
‘Ballroom’ accounts are still going to get questioned.
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: Rick on April 18, 2025, 09:44:44 PM
‘Ballroom’ accounts are still going to get questioned.
Well, yes, and if you ask 3 eye-witnesses about an incident you'll get 3 different versions of events. But, bearing that in mind, this film seems to have far more control by the people who were there than is usually the case.
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: HerbertTarkel on April 18, 2025, 11:42:11 PM
It’s had pretty good reviews here in Canada. Lots of jargon to satisfy the people who understand, the one reviewer was bewildered by some common lingo  lol
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: SJWi on April 19, 2025, 05:27:07 AM
Very good reviews in the UK so far.  Even my wife has asked if I will be going to see it with my mates .She has declined to come with me.
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: AKULA on April 19, 2025, 10:22:02 AM
Thanks, will give it a look

 :)
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: mikedemana on April 20, 2025, 12:48:52 AM
Three wargamer friends and I went to see it four days ago. I enjoyed it. Think Black Hawk Down, but scaled back. Much smaller operation, but still that "mission gone wrong" vibe. Similar very loud scene performing first aid on a severely injured soldier.

I enjoyed it, though. I had never read accounts of a mission with so many Navy SEALS deployed in one spot, though. So, that was an eye opener. Using a Bradley Fighting vehicle as a medevac in urban warfare was also a new one to me, though I possibly had read of this before and just not remembered it. The "show of force" by jet fighters was new to me, as well.

Without giving anything away, you definitely get the feeling at the end: "And what was the point of that mission...?" Perhaps that was the goal of the film makers. Perhaps it was simply me being the armchair commander doing a post-mission analysis.

Still, I would recommend going to see it. Definitely violent and bloody, so don't take the wifey or girlfriend unless she's fine with that kind of stuff.  :D

Mike Demana
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: Rick on April 20, 2025, 02:07:08 AM
Mike, with 20/20 hindsight there are a great many military missions that come under the heading of: "well it probably seemed like a good idea at the time - you had to be there."  lol
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: Ultravanillasmurf on April 24, 2025, 06:08:18 PM
I saw it yesterday.

Gruelling and unrelenting.

I will not say that I enjoyed it,  but I am glad that I saw it.

I would recommend it.
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: CapnJim on April 24, 2025, 06:15:28 PM
My wife and I saw it yesterday.  UVS's description fits my reaction...

One note - the Bradleys ain't real Bradleys.  They are VISMOD'ed FV432s from Armourgeddon...but fairly well done VISMODs...
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: Ultravanillasmurf on April 24, 2025, 09:10:41 PM
One note - the Bradleys ain't real Bradleys.  They are VISMOD'ed FV432s from Armourgeddon...but fairly well done VISMODs...
I just assumed they were the FV432/30 (Fv432 with Fox turrets without the Mondrian paint jobs), but apparently additional ones have been created by Armourgeddon.
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: swiftnick on May 29, 2025, 09:06:00 AM
Saw it the other week and highly recommend it! When the action kicks off it really does and doesn't relent to the end. I had the shakes from adrenaline when the lights came up.
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: Brummie on May 29, 2025, 10:53:06 AM
Finally watched it yesterday.

Enjoyed it from the perspective it felt like it hit closer. It doesn't fit the usual story telling arc with most films and felt like watching a snapshot in time then a traditional film.

It was definitely jarring and even stressful at times, it was strange as the casualty scenes were familiar to many war films, but in Warfare it felt more unsettling. Would definitely recommend, but I doubt many who aren't aware enough or know enough will like it at all and their entire experience will hang off how uncomfortable sections of it is and how a great deal is left unspoken and merely implied. 

All in all very good film, hope A24 do more, as I thought Civil War was pretty good for what it was.
Title: Re: Warfare
Post by: Rickf on May 29, 2025, 12:35:24 PM
I thought it was an excellent film. As an ex JTAC (it's quite heavily JTAC based) with multiple tours of Iraq/Afghanistan, I usually watch these films with the intent of picking them to bits for accuracy lol. Not this one, I left the cinema in something of a daze, it was a bit too real. The opening scene is brilliant and brought back some happy memories of those times.