Lead Adventure Forum

Miniatures Adventure => The Conflicts that came in from the Cold => Topic started by: carlos marighela on 16 December 2011, 08:12:20 AM

Title: Recon 28
Post by: carlos marighela on 16 December 2011, 08:12:20 AM
I know Ebob is selling the trees but does anyone know what's happening with the 28mm Vietnam miniatures range he's sculpting? Every time I look at the website it seems they aren't for sale as yet. Seems to have been a long time since they went up on the site.
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: v_lazy_dragon on 16 December 2011, 10:57:45 AM
I had a chat with him the other day - he's working on  some more VC and special ops figures that he wants to get in the initial release; which should be scheduled for spring 2012...
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: DFlynSqrl on 16 December 2011, 02:29:40 PM
I check the site pretty regularly as well hoping they'll be available.
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: carlos marighela on 16 December 2011, 07:40:52 PM
Cheers. Such are the vaguaries of minis manufacturers.
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Helen on 16 December 2011, 07:45:14 PM
I posted on Face Book the question on the Vietnam miniatures when I saw the SAS miniatures and he replied "Christmas time."

Carlos, FOAs new Aussies look great.

Cheers,

Helen
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: carlos marighela on 16 December 2011, 07:55:21 PM
Chhers Helen. Now are they in proper patrolling poses or are they standard wargames fare? Mile Broadbent's Vietnam stuff is some of his best because the attention to detail is pretty good and he took a lot of feedback on the figures. If you can scan some pics of the FoA stuff I'd be grateful.
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Helen on 16 December 2011, 08:05:48 PM
Chhers Helen. Now are they in proper patrolling poses or are they standard wargames fare? Mile Broadbent's Vietnam stuff is some of his best because the attention to detail is pretty good and he took a lot of feedback on the figures. If you can scan some pics of the FoA stuff I'd be grateful.

Hi Carlos, from the photos provided to me by a member of Fields of Fire forum they look to me as if they are patrolling/advancing. He has added packs to the FOA Aussies. I've the Pl HQ coming across so I'll get a better photo for you that is not in conflict with other miniatures this guy sent me.

Still don't understand why companies keep making Owens instead of F1s for Vietnam miniatures. Considering Ian Skennerton's book on Australian Service Machine Guns clearly mentions the withdrawl of Owens and the introduction of the F1s prior to Vietnam.

Cheers,

Helen
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: carlos marighela on 16 December 2011, 08:34:20 PM
Still don't understand why companies keep making Owens instead of F1s for Vietnam miniatures. Considering Ian Skennerton's book on Australian Service Machine Guns clearly mentions the withdrawl of Owens and the introduction of the F1s prior to Vietnam.

Well actually I can and it's one thing the Eureka figures get wrong. The Owen was still very much in use in Vietnam. Read the official histories, various battalion war diaries etc and it's pretty clear it was. There's quite a bit of photographic evidence for it too. They were definitely used up until at least Long Tan. the famous episode of the crew commander of one the APCs dispatching an RCL crew in the closing phases of the battle was done with an Owen.

By that stage they were already being replaced by M16s and then in 1967 by M16A1s.  I'm afraid that Mr Skennerton is almost certainly in error.

The F1 was useless bit of kit. I remember firing them bak in the 1980s, we did so once a year and bizzarely it was one of the weapons taught in IET and also for things like subject 1 for corporal. Apart from that the only time it ever came out was for pay parades where a couple of unfortnates got to stand around with one sans magazine which was kept in your pocket lest an unfortnate accident occur. The only people who carried them in an infantry battalion were transport platoon drivers.

Now all kinds of things were kept on strength by various odds and sods like transport sigs and the cockroaches. There was a transport unit in Victoria that still had 7.62mm Brens on strength. I was sorely aggrieved that I missed what was probably the last opportunity to fire the things at Puckapunyal, probably around 1991.
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Helen on 16 December 2011, 09:41:39 PM
Well actually I can and it's one thing the Eureka figures get wrong. The Owen was still very much in use in Vietnam. Read the official histories, various battalion war diaries etc and it's pretty clear it was. There's quite a bit of photographic evidence for it too. They were definitely used up until at least Long Tan. the famous episode of the crew commander of one the APCs dispatching an RCL crew in the closing phases of the battle was done with an Owen.

By that stage they were already being replaced by M16s and then in 1967 by M16A1s.  I'm afraid that Mr Skennerton is almost certainly in error.

The F1 was useless bit of kit. I remember firing them bak in the 1980s, we did so once a year and bizzarely it was one of the weapons taught in IET and also for things like subject 1 for corporal. Apart from that the only time it ever came out was for pay parades where a couple of unfortnates got to stand around with one sans magazine which was kept in your pocket lest an unfortnate accident occur. The only people who carried them in an infantry battalion were transport platoon drivers.

Now all kinds of things were kept on strength by various odds and sods like transport sigs and the cockroaches. There was a transport unit in Victoria that still had 7.62mm Brens on strength. I was sorely aggrieved that I missed what was probably the last opportunity to fire the things at Puckapunyal, probably around 1991.

I shall look at this more closely, thanks Carlos. I used the F1 in Malaya in 1980 and I used the bren during my time in anti-arnour.

Cheers,

Helen
Edit: How bad do I feel for not researching about the Aussies in South Vietnam. Accepting the sound advice of an expert and a book. Never will I do that again.
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: carlos marighela on 17 December 2011, 03:47:16 AM
All Mr Skennerton needed to have done was search the AWM collection. Quite a few photos of Owens in use in Vietnam by infantry battalions, vis:

http://cas.awm.gov.au/item/CUN/66/0519/VN

http://cas.awm.gov.au/item/P01217.007

etc etc.

Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Helen on 17 December 2011, 10:04:47 AM
All Mr Skennerton needed to have done was search the AWM collection. Quite a few photos of Owens in use in Vietnam by infantry battalions, vis:

http://cas.awm.gov.au/item/CUN/66/0519/VN

http://cas.awm.gov.au/item/P01217.007

etc etc.



Thanks Carlos very much.

Cheers,

Helen
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Sunray61 on 23 December 2011, 01:06:53 AM
When my Battalion - 4th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment (4 RAR) - deployed to South Vietnam in May 1968 we were equipped with M16A1s in lieu of Owen Guns or F1s.  We were issued with M16A1s in late 1967 after our return to Australia in October 1967 from a two year tour in Malaysia which included five months in Borneo during Konfrontasi with Indonesia.

About this time the F1 was relegated to drivers, clerks and storemen in the non-combat corps.

During our tour in Malaysia with 28th Commonwealth Brigade from October 1965 to October 1967 we were equipped with AR15s in lieu of Owen Guns.  I believe these weapons were from British stocks and were AR15s and not the military version M16.

In Malaysia were were also equipped with MAG58s and 7.62 mm Bren LMGs from British stocks.  We were also issued with four 120 mm WOMBAT anti-tank guns in lieu of the 106 mm RCL wich was the standard heavy anti-tank weapon (HAW) in Australian battalions in Australia and Vietnam.  This was to standardize weapons within the Commonwealth Brigade which included British, New Zealand and Australian infantry battalions.

As a footnote, in Vietnam we were equipped with US 90 mm RCLs as the battalion's medium anti-tank weapon (MAW) as Sweden would not supply Australia with  84 mm Carl Gustav ammunition for use in Vietnam.  The Carl Gustav was the standard MAW in the Australian battalions in Australia.
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Helen on 23 December 2011, 03:19:37 AM
When my Battalion - 4th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment (4 RAR) - deployed to South Vietnam in May 1968 we were equipped with M16A1s in lieu of Owen Guns or F1s.  We were issued with M16A1s in late 1967 after our return to Australia in October 1967 from a two year tour in Malaysia which included five months in Borneo during Konfrontasi with Indonesia.

About this time the F1 was relegated to drivers, clerks and storemen in the non-combat corps.

During our tour in Malaysia with 28th Commonwealth Brigade from October 1965 to October 1967 we were equipped with AR15s in lieu of Owen Guns.  I believe these weapons were from British stocks and were AR15s and not the military version M16.

In Malaysia were were also equipped with MAG58s and 7.62 mm Bren LMGs from British stocks.  We were also issued with four 120 mm WOMBAT anti-tank guns in lieu of the 106 mm RCL wich was the standard heavy anti-tank weapon (HAW) in Australian battalions in Australia and Vietnam.  This was to standardize weapons within the Commonwealth Brigade which included British, New Zealand and Australian infantry battalions.

As a footnote, in Vietnam we were equipped with US 90 mm RCLs as the battalion's medium anti-tank weapon (MAW) as Sweden would not supply Australia with  84 mm Carl Gustav ammunition for use in Vietnam.  The Carl Gustav was the standard MAW in the Australian battalions in Australia.

Thanks for the information.

Cheers,

Helen
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Arlequín on 23 December 2011, 09:19:48 AM
Interesting stuff all round... I strongly suspect from all this is that the Australian Army's unofficial motto is "Provide the guns and booze and we're with you mate!" though.

 ;)
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: BlindFool on 29 December 2013, 06:13:41 AM
Just thought I'd revive this topic allbeit for a progress update on this promising figure/ruleset - if anyone has one?

(I do understand that Ebob is much in demand - but I think there are enough of us out here to continue our interest/support of the range)
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Legion1963 on 29 December 2013, 07:56:19 AM
There was a time when i regularly checked his website hoping from some news. But since i have bought a bunch of TAG miniatures the need to visit the website has become less. Being slightly familiar with the whole process of miniature making i suppose there has been some sort of delay. However, depending on my budget and what eventually will be offered for sale, i still might be interested.
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: carlos marighela on 29 December 2013, 08:19:53 AM
I believe Recon 28 actually stands for RElease at a CONvention in about 28 years.

Still 2015 will mark the 50th anniversary of the commitment of large scale US ground forces to the war (and Australians too). Who knows, maybe that's what he is waiting for?
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Elk101 on 29 December 2013, 11:28:56 AM
I have been checking for updates on this for some time to.  I haven't yet committed to Vietnam figures yet as I've been slowly picking up helicopters. If these are still some time off I'll probably just go with Force of Arms and Parkfield. Like Legion said, these could always be added later.
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Arlequín on 29 December 2013, 02:20:12 PM
Add me to the frustrated masses... I've been looking forwards to seeing these come out for what seems like forever. I 'like' the look of the TAG and FoA figures, but 'love' the Recon 28 ones. Short of Paul Hicks, or Kostas over at Eureka 'doing Vietnam', I will continue to wait for the Recon figures... and wait, and wait...

 ;)
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: NurgleHH on 29 December 2013, 02:28:52 PM
It is a shame, that these range will never come. Maybe Ebob can give a statement.
But did Paul Hicks Vietnam???
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Arlequín on 29 December 2013, 02:46:11 PM
Not as far as I know, but he is doing the wonderful Red Star Indochina figures... which will presently include the Viet Minh (http://www.sdean-forum.co.uk/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=35839&p=398982).

:)
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: carlos marighela on 29 December 2013, 03:34:23 PM
Love the bloke apparently falling over whilst firing his submachine gun. Aprt from that very nice figures and unlike the last batch, not a single member of the Royal Family amongst this lot.  ;)
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Elk101 on 29 December 2013, 04:15:00 PM
I've emailed Ebob and asked about the Recon 28 range availability.

I like the Paul Hicks sculpts.
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: NurgleHH on 29 December 2013, 08:27:40 PM
Wow, great stuff. I love it too...
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Legion1963 on 29 December 2013, 08:35:10 PM
Add me to the frustrated masses... I've been looking forwards to seeing these come out for what seems like forever. I 'like' the look of the TAG and FoA figures, but 'love' the Recon 28 ones. Short of Paul Hicks, or Kostas over at Eureka 'doing Vietnam', I will continue to wait for the Recon figures... and wait, and wait...

 ;)
Well, while you're waiting why not come over and run some recon with some mine TAG miniatures. These are really very good and the service at TAG is excellent.
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Happy Wanderer on 25 February 2014, 08:26:07 AM
...just found these.

What lovely figures and they will most definitely work for the Rhodesian Bush War....I'll be ordering some of these!

Check them out.

Lovely stuff

(http://www.ebobminiatures.com/recon28/greens/sasr2b.jpg)

Recon 28 Australians

http://www.ebobminiatures.com/recon28/gallery2.htm (http://www.ebobminiatures.com/recon28/gallery2.htm)
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: NurgleHH on 25 February 2014, 08:38:19 AM
@happy wanderer: The problem is, that they need to be released. We wait since two years, I think
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Juan on 25 February 2014, 04:11:32 PM
Yes, very nice figures. I think they are a legend...

 ;)
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: NurgleHH on 25 February 2014, 05:46:20 PM
Yes, very nice figures. I think they are a legend...

 ;)

No, I think they are the "one ring" in miniature-scene. A kind of torture for us... :(
Title: Re: Recon 28
Post by: Legion1963 on 25 February 2014, 08:08:56 PM
Yes, very nice figures. I think they are a legend...

 ;)

Yes, and legend turned into myth.....and what should have been remembered(released) was forgotten.  8)