Lead Adventure Forum
Miniatures Adventure => Call of Cthulhu => Strange Aeons => Topic started by: rcketscientst on 08 November 2015, 10:39:04 PM
-
So, my daughter and I playing a game of SA (my kind of family bonding.) The scenario is Treasure Hunt, the variant. Her lurker list consists of a witch, some familiars, a serpentman, and a hybrid. Well, my Threshold team has killed everything except the witch. Unfortunately, the witch found the treasure and has "Fair Beauty" cast on herself. She passed every resolve test as I whittled down the lurker list. So now, my remaining team stands between her and the board edge, but they cannot do anything to her. Or can they?
Am I missing something?
-
I had the same question. Hope someone can help!
-
The only way that I can think of is to have a Threshold Magic user have the spell "Compel" and cast it against the Witch to have her directly cast a spell (Although it doesn't say so in the compel spell, I have assumed that Shooting is the equivalent of casting a spell) which will cancel the Fair Maiden spell. Otherwise, I believe you are out of luck and will lose the scenario. And if I am incorrect. You lose,
Lem
-
Fair enough.
However, looking at the objectives for the lurkers, they need to eliminate the threshold agents or get the treasure off the board. Which I prevented by encircling the witch. I could find no rules for stalemate. So treating it as not "winning", so no automatic roll. I would suppose the only other box on the sheet is "loss". Seems a bit anticlimatic.
-
Interesting. I would say loss for Threshold. :? They can't all be zingers I guess! Advise: Next time you play Treasure Hunt don't allow the Variant if you are worried about the searching Witch. Or...in a regular game of Treasure Hunt always target the Witch!!! ;)
-
Also. No. I don;t think it is fair...
-
But then life is not fair either. Somehow I will go on.
It is alright, I got back the following game. Now she is off creating her next lurker list. Seems a bit like nuclear escalation.
Like I said, family bonding.
And thank you for the inputs. It is helping me "understand" the ruleset.