Lead Adventure Forum

Miniatures Adventure => Fantasy Adventures => Topic started by: julesav on 05 December 2016, 12:04:41 PM

Title: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: julesav on 05 December 2016, 12:04:41 PM: Hi folks

I'm looking at revamping an old project with some Red Box character figures - how well do they match with the likes of Gripping Beast, Crusader, Artizan et al?

Cheers

Julesav
Title: Re: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: LeadAsbestos on 05 December 2016, 02:03:22 PM: I love Red Box, because they are the best sculpted minis available, and I hate them because they are tiny and don't scale.up.with anything.
Title: Re: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: Cubs on 05 December 2016, 03:15:52 PM: Quote from: julesav on 05 December 2016, 12:04:41 PM
Hi folks

I'm looking at revamping an old project with some Red Box character figures - how well do they match with the likes of Gripping Beast, Crusader, Artizan et al?

Cheers

Julesav

Here's a comparison shot of a Redbox Njorn (war hammer and green shield to the left of centre) and some Gripping Beast vikings (except the guy in the centre with the yellow shield). Now bearing in mind that this particular Redbox Njorn is a fairly sturdy example and quite largely built you can see that his proportions are a little more slender than the others (especially the clumpier, older GB sculpts) and possibly a little shorter. I have raised him up on a nice high base though, as a character model, so the difference isn't quite as noticeable.

I don't think it's the height, quite so much as the proportions that show up as the difference. Most 28mm miniatures have slightly exaggerated extremities (heads and hands really), whereas the Redbox ones don't.

(https://myalbum.com/photo/qpeoGxAZoWu4/360.jpg)
Title: Re: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: Coenus Scaldingus on 05 December 2016, 03:39:48 PM: Adding to the above, the models are absolutely lovely, but proportions are very much on the other end of the scale. Here a quick line-up with Gripping Beast plastic, RBG, GB metal, RBG, Perry metal, RBG, Perry plastic. Some models will look better than others given how slender or bulky the character is, but the heads especially are tiny in comparison. Two close-ups of the same to show off the differences a bit better.

(http://i1194.photobucket.com/albums/aa378/DiomedesOfArgos/DSCN7306.3_zpseb2phyk8.jpg~original)

(http://i1194.photobucket.com/albums/aa378/DiomedesOfArgos/DSCN7306.4_zpsuljwn1of.jpg~original)

(http://i1194.photobucket.com/albums/aa378/DiomedesOfArgos/DSCN7306.5_zpswkqyz3qj.jpg~original)
Title: Re: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: Elbows on 05 December 2016, 03:47:23 PM: I too struggle with the RBG scale and have thus avoided purchasing any of them. I did go and buy most of Tre Manor's sculpts from Reaper though which are superb and far more in scale with other heroic models.
Title: Re: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: FramFramson on 05 December 2016, 06:04:49 PM: I've bought some Red Box women, as their being noticeably smaller or slenderer still works out fine, but the men are incompatible with pretty much any figure range I use.
Title: Re: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: madzerker on 06 December 2016, 06:30:13 AM: I use Red Box barbarians and norse and they scale up great with rackham, freebooter, privateer press humans, hell dorado, among a ton of other ranges. In the example above one figure is an elf, another a half elf, not the best if comparing with humans but they do have real scale head and hands which I prefer. They don't scale well with bobble head miniatures like old GW and a lot of historical ranges.
Title: Re: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: Steam Flunky on 11 December 2016, 08:37:10 AM: I have just recieved a couple of Red Box dwarves and they are much smaller than i expected. They are probably the most realistic and detailed dwarf figures i have seen and i am very pleased with them, but compared to GW, Mantic, Reaper etc they are more hobbit than dwarf size.
Cheers
Robert
Title: Re: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: Nord on 11 December 2016, 08:43:43 AM: They don't really match any of those "chunky" sculpts. They are more like the GW Lord of the Rings range, or possibly Perry plastics. As has been said, slender and small. Very small in fact.
Title: Re: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: Severian on 11 December 2016, 05:46:00 PM: I'd echo what already been said - I have a few of their dwarves and goblins, and they are marvellous sculpts. The dwarves in particular are outstanding - amazing amounts of detail without being finicky, and bags of character.
But yes, they are pretty small. For goblins this doesn't bother me in the slightest: I like a good range of sizes and shapes there.
The dwarves, though - well, they're perhaps a bit larger than the old Ral Partha dwarves that Citadel rebranded as gnomes in the 1st Compendium, but not by very much. They're such great sculpts, though, that I plan to ignore this and field them alongside a mixed bag of variously larger figures (and most of my dwarves are old school sized...).
Title: Re: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: kaiser on 11 December 2016, 06:45:32 PM: I think that they scale well next to Perry miniatures. The dwarfs will probably fit in size next to GW Lord of The Rings dwarfs.
Title: Re: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: Psychoflexible on 12 December 2016, 07:59:32 PM: I use them with Hasslefree, grenadier and Celtos mini in my barbarian army and they fit very well !
Title: Re: Red Box Games - relative size
Post by: Grimmnar on 21 December 2016, 05:42:18 AM: 1st gen dwarves though are bigger and scale in better.

Grimm