Lead Adventure Forum

Miniatures Adventure => Fantasy Adventures => Topic started by: nervisfr on February 18, 2017, 03:59:43 PM

Title: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: nervisfr on February 18, 2017, 03:59:43 PM
hey guys,

i have started a warband for Advanced Song of Blade and Heroes based on Ex-Grenadier Coppelstone barbarians. I played them as cavemen or prehistoric warriors. See for here on the LAF (http://leadadventureforum.com/index.php?topic=97761.0) or here http://chti-reanimator59.blogspot.fr/2017/02/re-animator-un-gros-gourdin.html on my blog for more technical details)

I would like to mix them with Reaper Barbarians as leader or champion for my warband , but i need to know if they are mixable with classical 28mm as the Coppelstone.  :wacko:

77373: Cuth Wolfson, Barbarian
(http://www.reapermini.com/graphics/gallery/4/77373_w_1.jpg)

77199: Thund Bloodwrack, Barbarian
(http://www.reapermini.com/graphics/gallery/4/77199_w_1.jpg)

77061: Kord the Destroyer
(http://www.reapermini.com/graphics/gallery/4/77061_w_1.jpg)


thank for your help

cheers
Eric
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: beefcake on February 18, 2017, 06:54:54 PM
I don't have those minis but I do have the cobblestones. Judging by the height markers on those pics I'd say they are quite a bit bigger. The first one should be good but the bottom definitely too big. Hopefully you'll get better scale pics on here though..
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: Spooktalker on February 18, 2017, 07:41:07 PM
No, do you see the scale markers on the right? The higher one is at 1"!  Generally you should expect Reaper figures to tower over the Copplestones.

My barbarians are packed away but a Copplestone human here is 28mm to the eye and maybe the barbarians are 1mm taller. A typical Reaper figure is 30-32 mm to the eye. Reaper barbarians are often much taller, especially if newer like the ones you show. This one here is older but still 35mm to the eye:

(http://www.reapermini.com/graphics/gallery/4/02152_w_1.jpg)
http://www.reapermini.com/OnlineStore/garrity%20barbarian/sku-down/02152

You can find a few that will mix in fine. This one is atypically short at 28mm to the eye (though his pose is not standing straight.

(http://www.reapermini.com/graphics/gallery/4/02358_w_1.jpg)
http://www.reapermini.com/OnlineStore/garrity%20barbarian/sku-down/02358

Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: nervisfr on February 18, 2017, 08:40:51 PM
Thank you guys,

That's what i thought about them. :?

For a leader or a champion, big is not a problem but it's must stay something humanly possible  :D
May be like the heresy Boris the barbarian, i used in my nordic bloodbowl
Foundry team.

The new Reaper are more animated than the old ones but the scale is higher so i have to choose between animation and scale mixable with the coppelstone...

Cheers

Eric

Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: barbaric splendor on February 19, 2017, 12:22:02 AM
Here is a picture with a couple of the Reaper miniatures you showed, and a Copplestone barbarian.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v465/kevd82/unnamed%201_zps7c08rzxk.png)
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: nervisfr on February 19, 2017, 08:13:08 AM
Excellent barbaric splendor !

I know which one could fill the job  ;) for my Coppelstone warband   :-*

Cheers
Eric
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: dinohunterpoa on February 20, 2017, 01:21:04 AM
nervisfr, I have that Bones 77199: Thund Bloodwrack, Barbarian and all I can say is: stay away from it! A really awful sculpt! :o

Copplestone's, in the other hand, are some of the very best in the business!  ;)  Since you play them as cavemen/prehistoric warriors, what about mixing them with C12 Cavewomen?

(http://www.copplestonecastings.co.uk/images/img53.jpg)

  
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: nervisfr on February 20, 2017, 08:49:11 AM
nervisfr, I have that Bones 77199: Thund Bloodwrack, Barbarian and all I can say is: stay away from it! A really awful sculpt! :o

Copplestone's, in the other hand, are some of the very best in the business!  ;)  Since you play them as cavemen/prehistoric warriors, what about mixing them with C12 Cavewomen?

(http://www.copplestonecastings.co.uk/images/img53.jpg)

  

thank you dinohunterpoa for the warning !

i have already the Coppelstone girls

(https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8267/29031547784_e766eaa5d9_b.jpg)

and i think to add some Celtos converted girls in my clan (the bikini ones).

Cheers
eric
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: dinohunterpoa on February 20, 2017, 10:33:55 AM
and i think to add some Celtos converted girls in my clan (the bikini ones).
Cheers
eric

Of course!!! ;)

What about Copplestone's BQ1 Barbarian Queen?

(http://www.copplestonecastings.co.uk/images/img256.jpg)

In a cavegirls setting, you can explain her sword and metal shield as some relics she found in a very old barrow...  (at least this worked for my game world ;))



Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: Michi on February 20, 2017, 10:45:07 AM
i have already the Coppelstone girls and i think to add some Celtos converted girls in my clan (the bikini ones).

That is a cunning plan Eric!  :D
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: nervisfr on February 20, 2017, 11:28:02 AM
Of course!!! ;)

What about Copplestone's BQ1 Barbarian Queen?

(http://www.copplestonecastings.co.uk/images/img256.jpg)

In a cavegirls setting, you can explain her sword and metal shield as some relics she found in a very old barrow...  (at least this worked for my game world ;))





you are right !

i forgot that one..... ;D ;D

and with a little conversion work , these ones (Coppelstone too, i think ?) from Foundry :

(http://www.wargamesfoundry.com/files/cache/d1f0c02733551051ce55d8e317df05fa_f6413.png)

Eric
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: dinohunterpoa on February 20, 2017, 04:18:08 PM
and with a little conversion work , these ones (Coppelstone too, i think ?) from Foundry :
Eric

Why the need for a conversion work? Oh, it took me a little time to see the guns in their hands! ;D

Also (and prettier ones IMHO):

Copplestone FW45 - Bodyguards in Bikinis

(http://www.copplestonecastings.co.uk/images/img228.jpg)

 ;)
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: nervisfr on February 21, 2017, 07:32:54 AM
yes and yes !

and the Coppelstone are cheaper than the Foundry ones... lol

cheap Babes !  very rare indeed  o_o


and from Celtos we can get :

(http://img01.deviantart.net/4ba9/i/2011/205/6/a/celtos_swordmaidens__of_khorne_by_majere613-d41h06s.jpg)

with a little work to make them more primitive...as we like


Eric
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: dinohunterpoa on February 21, 2017, 03:52:25 PM
yes and yes !
and the Coppelstone are cheaper than the Foundry ones... lol
cheap Babes !  very rare indeed  o_o
and from Celtos we can get :
with a little work to make them more primitive...as we like
Eric

Nice pick on the Celtos girls! They have lots of character! ;)

And this is the last cavegirl I got:

(http://images.brickset.com/sets/images/8805-5.jpg)

Seriously! :)

Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: eMills on February 21, 2017, 05:08:16 PM
nervisfr, I have that Bones 77199: Thund Bloodwrack, Barbarian and all I can say is: stay away from it! A really awful sculpt! :o
It's really not. It's an excellent sculpt. Objectively executed better than anything you've recommended so far from Coppertone.

Bones may not be doing it any favors, but it is still a fantastic sculpt. Here is my own (stalled) effort with the sculpt in question:
(http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t279/ejdmo/20150610_212432_zpssacjvoce.jpg) (http://s162.photobucket.com/user/ejdmo/media/20150610_212432_zpssacjvoce.jpg.html)

Maybe obtaining it in metal would be a better idea nervisfr?

~Eric
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: Steve F on February 21, 2017, 05:23:22 PM
The Foundry "Ballistic Beach Babes" were sculpted by Shane Hoyle, not Mark Copplestone (who had already left Foundry before the Street Violence range launched).
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: nervisfr on February 22, 2017, 12:37:02 PM

To Steve F

Thank you for the precision.  ;)

to eMills

i thought like you that the metal one could be better that the Bone one.
i have done some Bones's great orcs and some details on the little head where too smooth. Then i have to change the head (here (http://forum.reapermini.com/index.php?/topic/68728-great-orcs-bones-77051-77042-77059/) on the Reaper Forum)

(https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1519/26261145516_239f0b0c0a_b.jpg)

Eric
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: dinohunterpoa on February 22, 2017, 05:59:14 PM
i have done some Bones's great orcs and some details on the little head where too smooth. Then i have to change the head (here (http://forum.reapermini.com/index.php?/topic/68728-great-orcs-bones-77051-77042-77059/) on the Reaper Forum)
Eric



Chopping off the head out of Bones minis must be a very nice feeling!  lol lol lol

Those orcs came up very nice!  ;)
Title: Re: Reaper Barbarian vs Coppelstone comparison scale needed
Post by: nervisfr on February 22, 2017, 07:04:10 PM
Now they are looking more dangerous  o_o

As do the real orcs.