Interesting it didn't win any awards as "not fitting in any category". It has been described as a "static display" or " diorama".
Oddly, the Retired Wargamers "Berlin 1945" won best terrain at Salute despite the gentlemen forgetting their rules, tape measures and dice, as they admitted in an interview ......
No disrespect or criticism intended for those gentlemen and it was a worthy winner for megalomaniac effort alone if not the fine craftsmanship.
I just wanted to draw the parallel that it wasn't "played". Way back when, MOST Partizan games looked beautiful but were often not actually played. Does a "demonstration" game have to be played now?
I'm aware most US and Canadian gamers will be scratching their heads at the concept....?
More to the point, what do punters want? At Partizan I could hardly see some games for the backs of players who studiously avoided any contact with the public; notable exceptions being James Morris and his game and the Rome v Sassanid game with a dedicated spokesperson. Many were very nice looking games.
I suspect that in addition to the shopping and socialising, many gamers go to shows to be "inspired" whether by games that most people could achieve or those they can only inspire to. Demo games have long been problematic in it being unclear what they are demonstrating. In the case of Bill Gaskin's it was skill and artistry of him and his collaborators and I think it should be appreciated even if most of us will never get close.
Neil