The statistics of today frequently break gang statistics down by Hispanic; African American; Asian; White, Non-Hispanic; Other. Growing up in Los Angeles I found that to be true in most cases in the 1950-1970 time frame.
The "Gangs of New York" in the middle to late 1800's (and else where) were the flip-side of Multi-cultural (very ethnic oriented) from what I understand (that era of American city history is not a a strong suit for my degrees) so you'd have Irish, German, Italian, Jewish, etc., gangs? Would there be any visible differences in clothing style that would differentiate one Caucasian, non-Hispanic group from another?
Some interesting reading -
http://www.gangresearch.net/Archives/UIC/Courses/history/beforethrash.htmlAnd some quotes from
http://social.jrank.org/pages/1256/Violent-Crime-Diversification-Gangs.html"...Youth gangs have traditionally been racially and ethnically segregated, located in large urban centers, and associated with violent activity..." Note that is claimed to be changing.
"...New immigrant groups that enter the United States often flock to the same area and in short order form gang like organizations. Some of the early ones include the Irish gangs of the mid-1800s with names like Whyos, Dead Rabbits, and Plug Uglies. In New York City the Monk Eastman Gang, made up primarily of Jewish immigrants, terrorized the streets during the late 1800s. Among the Monk Eastman Gang's rivals were the newly forming Italian gangs, like the Five Point Gang..."
Gracias,
Glenn