*

Recent Topics

Author Topic: Meticulous planning. A plan too far?  (Read 1207 times)

Offline Silbuster

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 210
Meticulous planning. A plan too far?
« on: 02 February 2014, 08:01:22 PM »
There are some serious reservations with regards to the “Meticulous planning” talent. In scenarios  “Bring him back alive”  and “Catch the pigeon”, the enemy playing piece escorting the captured piece can simply be moved back every time it moves forward. It never exits the board. The effect is less severe in the “Standard scenario” since there are more objectives but it still hurts. In “Breakthrough”, it is almost impossible to stop at least one piece with, effectively, a double move from making it to the other side of the board while in “Marked for Death”, the enemy’s chief is consistently moved towards the enemy every turn; it’s very hard to protect them.

This might be alright if “Meticulous planning” was not so comparatively cheap at 15 points and yet has no range limitation or way of resisting it. Its nearest equivalent is mesmerism, which costs 14 points, is limited to 12” and requires both the player to pass his pluck and the target to fail theirs. The latter point is particularly relevant since it allows one to make one’s opponent’s most powerful piece impotent.

This is a shame since “Meticulous Planning” is characteristic of the colour of the period and it would certainly be a great loss. What I would suggest is that its successful use should depend on its user passing a pluck test and on its target failing its pluck test. However, in the event of failure, then the player who owns the intended victim should return the favour by either moving one of his own or the casting player’s pieces as if he had “Meticulous planning” himself.

“Ha ha! So Moriarty! Another cunning plan foiled!”
“Damn you Holmes, you’ll pay tor this!”

Just to remove any confusion:
The player attempting “Meticulous Planning” must pass a pluck test and, if a member of his own team is his target, then his target must pass his pluck test too in order for the “Meticulous Plan” to succeed.
If his target is an enemy, the the enemy must fail his pluck test in order for the “Meticulous Plan” to succeed.
If, however, the enemy figure passes his pluck test then he may attempt to reply in kind by attempting his own “Meticulous Planning” using the previous target figure as the figure attempting it . If he fails then that’s the end of the sequence.

« Last Edit: 03 February 2014, 07:30:00 PM by Silbuster »

Offline Craig

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2078
  • Youth & Talent are no match for Age and Treachery.
    • The Ministry of Gentlemanly Warfare
Re: Meticulous planning. A plan too far?
« Reply #1 on: 04 February 2014, 05:34:22 AM »
I have passed this onto its author  :D
My sincerest contrafibularities
General Lord Craig Arthur Wellesey Cartmell (ret'd)
https://theministryofgentlemanlywarfare.wordpress.com/

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
1 Replies
2047 Views
Last post 04 June 2013, 02:38:51 AM
by Supercollider
18 Replies
5445 Views
Last post 07 November 2013, 01:08:23 PM
by Archie
2 Replies
1958 Views
Last post 30 January 2014, 05:23:17 PM
by Genialjim
27 Replies
4980 Views
Last post 29 July 2014, 01:06:46 AM
by d phipps
29 Replies
1846 Views
Last post 15 September 2025, 11:47:14 PM
by Rick