*

Recent Topics

Author Topic: US interwar infantry tactics question  (Read 2403 times)

Offline commissarmoody

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 8859
    • Moodys Adventures
US interwar infantry tactics question
« on: 19 May 2013, 07:56:22 AM »
I was wondering if any one might know, or at least be able to point out to me a place to find out what how US army tactics changed daring the interwar years.
Also when did the army change from the huge squad and platoon structure of the great war to the smaller World war to version
"Peace" is that brief, glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.

- Anonymous

Offline Arlequín

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 6218
  • Culpame de la Bossa Nova...

Offline commissarmoody

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 8859
    • Moodys Adventures
Re: US interwar infantry tactics question
« Reply #2 on: 19 May 2013, 01:50:03 PM »
Thanks for the light reading  lol

Offline CorvetteK225

  • Librarian
  • Posts: 146
Re: US interwar infantry tactics question
« Reply #3 on: 20 May 2013, 11:00:29 AM »
I am not sure what you mean by huge squad and platoon. In WWI, the squad was only eight men as compared to the triangular formations as mentioned above. In WWII triangular formation, the US Army was built around an 11 man squad. Yes, the divisions did shrink as they lost an infantry regiment, but this does not fit in with smaller echeloned commands associated with 15-28mm gaming scales.

As a side note, the French squad/platoon/company structure of 1918 was amazingly similar to the US WWII era 11 man squad. I don't have my notes here with me, but if I remeber correctly it was 10 men including: a two man chauchat team; three man rife grenade team; 4 man maneuver element; and of course a squad leader. Truly revolutionary!

As far as tactics between the wars, the US infantry had the same drills and formations. Don't be confused with trench warfare thrown in there as this was non-standard to the drill manuals of the day. Entire separate books cover these tactics, and were often either French translations, or by Commonwealth authors. I have a decent sized library of manuals ranging from 1912-1945 (again not here in Korea with me :-/) and love talking on this subject. :-)

Offline Arlequín

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 6218
  • Culpame de la Bossa Nova...
Re: US interwar infantry tactics question
« Reply #4 on: 20 May 2013, 01:57:06 PM »
So you are saying that Pershing's reorganisation of the AEF in 1917 was applicable 'just in France' and probably drawn from the advice (perhaps) of the French? Which makes sense.

That disregarded though, the actual paper strength of a rifle platoon in the AEF was the same 44 men (-ish) as in a WW2 rifle platoon, although organised slightly differently. Offhand though, the only army I know of that substantially reduced the size of its rifle platoons was Britain and that was due to manpower shortages, not tactical considerations.

I also like this sort of stuff... especially as I am frequently reminded that I know so little. :)
« Last Edit: 20 May 2013, 01:59:11 PM by Arlequín »

Offline commissarmoody

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 8859
    • Moodys Adventures
Re: US interwar infantry tactics question
« Reply #5 on: 20 May 2013, 10:36:57 PM »
I am not sure what you mean by huge squad and platoon.
I think maybe my readying might only pertain to trench warfare then. Because I was reading that the platoon was shaped into 4 sections, each task orated. With a 12 man grenadier section, 9 man rifle grenadiers section, 17 man rifle section and a 15 man automatic rifles section.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
33 Replies
11580 Views
Last post 20 October 2009, 09:34:50 PM
by Altius
12 Replies
4237 Views
Last post 20 March 2010, 01:43:10 PM
by huevans
71 Replies
16315 Views
Last post 13 June 2013, 04:34:53 AM
by Count Winsky
7 Replies
1630 Views
Last post 04 April 2013, 03:01:10 PM
by former user
1 Replies
313 Views
Last post 29 July 2025, 04:22:37 AM
by carlos marighela