Donate to the Lead Adventure Forum to keep it alive!
......The rules weren't that bad and IIRC, Rackham always wanted players, with increasing collections, to move on to Rag'Narok......
I play version 3.5... It is the version that is the most developed and has the kinks ironed out... Version 4 know as Age of Rag'Narok is an entirely different game almost. I've played a few sessions of that, but it's not very deep. It's easy to teach to a newbie though. 3.5 is the version most play. Great skirmish game... I do not recommend trying to adapt it to a large army game... Dragon Rampant is best for that in my opinion.
Personally I see little difference between LoS claiming they aren't Cadwallon and SD claiming they aren't LB. Honestly both sides of this legal coin have been less than clear.All this said, I think this is just fallout from SD and Cadwallon having less than friendly interactions after Stellar purchased the IP. Clearly SD is doing this to stunt and kill Cadwallon's KS. Personally I just think it's petty. They clearly waited until this KS was completed, whether that was to guarantee funding for a legal crusade or to avoid getting any more of a negative perception. I mean it's literally the next day. Lol.If taken to court I'd find it hard to believe they could win. The best they could do is force Loss to remove some of the line from the KS.
So Stellar got the Legends of Signum: Battle for Vallor KS shutdown? Is it possible that this cash grab was an attempt to partially or entirely cover legal expenses? Probably a silly question...
Statement from the LoS FB: https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/32940753_1545536688888462_3061660792639193088_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=82d592c7ead99053d4ef9fce5849ec6d&oe=5B7DB805
I feel like back LoS just to spite SD.