*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 07, 2024, 02:45:23 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Donate

We Appreciate Your Support

Members
  • Total Members: 10744
  • Latest: idawoj
Stats
  • Total Posts: 1722789
  • Total Topics: 120596
  • Online Today: 467
  • Online Ever: 2235
  • (October 29, 2023, 01:32:45 AM)
Users Online

Recent

Author Topic: Colonial rules  (Read 1165 times)

Offline Aethelwulf

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 278
Colonial rules
« on: December 04, 2023, 03:57:13 PM »
What rulesets for around 40 miniatures per side, do you chaps recommend?
''Any officer who goes into action without his sword is improperly dressed''-Jack Churchill

Offline italwars

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1145
Re: Colonial rules
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2023, 08:24:12 PM »
You 're talking, from my point of view, of a moderate Skirmish type action..
welll.. it's sooo easy to answer you:

  " The Sword And The Flame"  ! What else ?  ;) ;) ;) ;)

Offline EnclavedMicrostate

  • Librarian
  • Posts: 139
Re: Colonial rules
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2023, 04:15:21 AM »
Depends on period I suppose. The Men Who Would Be Kings is normally designed for an 'imperial' army of about 50 men versus a 'native' force of about 60-100 (depending on whether it's more of a fire-centric army like Afghans or Egyptians or a shock-centric one like Zulus or Mahdists), but the rules offer a 'Skirmish Kings' variant where you halve all unit sizes but leave all the other rules unchanged. For my part, I suspect that since most unit sizes are multiples of four that you could split the difference and reduce unit sizes by a quarter. So in other words, Skirmish Kings would see 25-ish 'imperial' versus 30-50 'native' troops; splitting the difference gives you about 40 versus 50-80.

Alternatively, there's a Sharp Practice variant for the Sudan that appears in Lard Magazine 2021 which you might want to have a look at. I personally have sort of gone off Sharp Practice for anything post-1815, but the rules variants for late 19th century models have got me tempted to give them another go for my Boshin War games.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2023, 06:48:26 AM by EnclavedMicrostate »

Offline SteveBurt

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1327
Re: Colonial rules
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2023, 11:09:40 AM »
Blood & Steel from Firelock games are quite good. Better than their pirate rules Blood & Plunder (the initiative system is cleaner), and the hidden objectives work well.

Online TWD

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1821
    • Tom's Toy Soldiers Blog
Re: Colonial rules
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2023, 12:51:25 PM »
Given the asymmetric nature of this type of warfare you'd generally expect the "imperial" forces to be about half the size of their opponents in number to give a reasonably balanced game. Equally sized forces would result in the superior firepower and discipline of the trained "imperial" forces winning easily.
So if you want 40 on one side you're probably looking at either 20 or 80 on the other :)

The Men Who Would Be Kings gives a good game. As someone above notes at the suggested size (24 points) your "non-imperial" forces are a bit bigger than 40 a side, but it works with smaller forces (or half sized units).

The Sword and the Flame is also pitched at the scale you are looking for - it is charming, but (to me at least) very dated and the combat in particular is fiddly - it was written more than 40 years ago and games and gaming mechanics have moved on since then.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
9 Replies
3120 Views
Last post May 22, 2010, 10:57:18 PM
by Smokeyrone
23 Replies
7137 Views
Last post January 27, 2016, 06:13:40 PM
by Volleyfire!
15 Replies
3394 Views
Last post May 04, 2013, 11:15:32 AM
by Nick2729
14 Replies
3684 Views
Last post March 08, 2014, 09:04:27 PM
by stefanov
0 Replies
1239 Views
Last post December 05, 2014, 12:00:33 AM
by ragnar69