All these new FR Reinforcements have got me thinking Brits in the Peninsular War..... but then again so have the Perry's stuff on their Metal's workbench!! Decisions.... decisions.....

Darrell.
It's a hard one, isn't it. I went FR because:
1. Always good clean castings. So are Perry, just saying.
2. I like figures with some chunkiness and horses with 'solid' legs that are well attached to their bases. Perry figs are thinner and the their horses are sometimes a bit weak 'at the base' - I'm forever having to bend my Crusades period horses and fear that they will one day come away from their base; individually based they would be fine (see pic below).
3. Alec's sculpting style suits my painting style.
4. Perry figures are too full of detail. This is a good thing if you have time to paint them or don't have too many to paint. I generally like to paint figures in batches of 40+; I'd paint Perry castings in batches nearer 20+. The process of getting them done would be much slower - as I said earlier, I recently bought 37 (24 man) battalions which is quite a few to get done.
5. Alec gives fair discounts as a matter of course. I've obtained discounts for large Perry orders from Dave T. in the past, but not as good as Alec can give - especially on an order of £2000+ (the parcel weighed in at 28KG). I've never gone to directly to Perry Minis for a large order so I don't know if they will give discount on direct sales.

In this shot you can clearly see what I mean. Some of the horses are leaning to the side because when they are picked up on multiple figure bases, the legs bend - I based my light cavalry mostly 3 to a base, heavy cavalry up to 5 to a base - and the legs are to the base on thinly cast 'tufts of grass'. They look great, but from a practical wargaming perspective they are too delicate (IMHO).