I agree, not one of mine look the same even when serendipitously you find you've used the same part combinations on a different figure. That is the real joy of the Perry plastics when yet another individual emerges off the assembly line.
You should know Captain B. You've probably seen more plastic Perry heads than all of us put together. If you say they're better than the metals then that's good enough for me!
Keep up the great work Charlie, they're coming together nicely. If I had one constructive criticism (and it is only one), I'd say the banners are a little simplistic for the look of the figures.
I find it tricky striking a balance between the look of the figure and the simplistic heraldry mentioned in Martin's books. I'm reevaluating my own banners and looking at how Medieval banners, particularly those with plainer surfaces, were often embellished with simple textured effects and minor details to decoratively fill the space. I'm thinking of flags like the Oriflamme and the WoTR/Tudor standards which often repeat the motifs in miniature and have decorative borders in contrasting colours etc. It seems to me also that the main standards of each house lend themselves more to the pseudo C15 style? where even the mottoes could be used
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=medieval+standards+and+banners&espv=2&biw=2240&bih=1202&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjBh6yX3d3KAhWGShQKHfqvBoEQsAQIJg&dpr=0.75#imgrc=dDBuO-on4GwRQM%3AMartin uses the sigils as a means of expressing affiliation to a group/house, which is a simplistic factional style of heraldry used historically up until the C13. As individuals became increasingly enclosed inside a metallic carapace, particularly shielding the face from view, heraldry evolved accordingly to help identify the individuals within.