*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 29, 2024, 12:58:08 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Donate

We Appreciate Your Support

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 1686601
  • Total Topics: 118110
  • Online Today: 626
  • Online Ever: 2235
  • (October 29, 2023, 12:32:45 AM)
Users Online

Recent

Author Topic: So darn cute FT-17  (Read 1881 times)

Offline jony663

  • Bookworm
  • Posts: 78
So darn cute FT-17
« on: January 20, 2017, 11:23:20 AM »
Or so said my wife about it down in Aberdeen MD.
This is a first look at Craig's (from Gaming Models) new FT-17.

Suitable for WWI , Inter-war Perion and WWII.

http://lebanon1982.blogspot.com/2017/01/renault-ft-17-oh-so-cute.html

So does anyone else have a need for these speed demons?

Jon
Regards Jon

Offline lou passejaire

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1274
Re: So darn cute FT-17
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2017, 02:31:11 PM »
the correct name of this small tank is "Renault FT" ... not FT-17  >:(

nice mini  ;)
Dans les situations critiques, quand on parle avec un calibre bien en pogne, personne ne conteste plus. Y'a des statistiques là-dessus.

Offline Tim

  • Librarian
  • Posts: 135
Re: So darn cute FT-17
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2017, 07:13:46 PM »
Sorry, Jon, it's an awful model.  I think there is a case to be made for inexpensive models, but not for terrible quality.

Am I allowed to say this here?
--
Tim

Offline jony663

  • Bookworm
  • Posts: 78
Re: So darn cute FT-17
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2017, 09:25:30 PM »
Tim I do not mind the criticism but can you explain what is so awful about the model.

Sorry, Jon, it's an awful model.  I think there is a case to be made for inexpensive models, but not for terrible quality.

Am I allowed to say this here?

Offline jony663

  • Bookworm
  • Posts: 78
Re: So darn cute FT-17
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2017, 09:26:55 PM »
Thank you noted.
the correct name of this small tank is "Renault FT" ... not FT-17  >:(

nice mini  ;)

Offline dadlamassu

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1535
    • http://www.morvalearth.co.uk
Re: So darn cute FT-17
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2017, 11:01:15 PM »
Tim I do not mind the criticism but can you explain what is so awful about the model.


I think he means that the rivet heads are way over size, the track units lack detail on the sides and too exaggerated on top.  But everyone has their own taste.  In 15mm I'd go for Peter Pig and in 1/76 I use the Revell/Matchbox ones or 1/72 the HaT Industrie models.

And there are some nice ones on the market in 15mm (and other scales & sizes)

A real one showing the actual size of the riveting.


Battlefield models one has smaller (but still too big) rivets


peter Pig




« Last Edit: January 23, 2017, 11:05:06 PM by dadlamassu »
'He could have lived a risk-free, moneyed life, but he preferred to whittle away his fortune on warfare.'
-- Xenophon, The Anabasis

Offline jony663

  • Bookworm
  • Posts: 78
Re: So darn cute FT-17
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2017, 03:35:34 AM »
Rivets can be an issue with early tank models. On some micro armor the rivers are huge, going from memory of GHQ. Peter Pig does nice work.

Offline Tim

  • Librarian
  • Posts: 135
Re: So darn cute FT-17
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2017, 07:21:59 AM »
Hi Jon,

Here are my criticisms.  I apologize for being negative, but there's just a lot wrong with this model.

The rivets have already been mentioned by dadlamassu.  They are so wide and high as to be only correctable by cutting them off and perhaps using rivets from Tichy or another company.  That would be enervating enough.

The ridges or cleats on the track are similarly bad.

The shape and slope of the back deck is appallingly incorrect.  The muffler looks very off too, but it could be a result of the deck mistakes.

The slope of the track towards the back does not seem steep enough - he may have got the size of the rear sprocket wrong or perhaps the front idler - the tracks should be above the front sloping driver's access hatches, not below them. 

There are huge rectangles sticking out for side vision ports which were just slits.

The support beams on the unditching tail are bad and it looks like an afterthought.

The turret looks oddly small, despite the enormous "rivets".

Even expanding your photo to its full size, I can't tell if the turret is hexagonal or round.  Hard to see, but the turret top looks quite misshapen.

The turret commander's station looks pretty coarsely cast - it should be smooth uniformly smooth, it isn't.

The thing projecting out from the turret to the right doesn't look anything like an SA18 gun.  It is grossly thick and is just a cylinder which is a pretty poor representation of a defining characteristic of the FT's armament.

On guns, the Gaming Models fellow seems to have trouble with that.  When I first heard of these I went to their catalog and he had like 5 models of the T-35 Soviet battleship tank, 2 more than there were, with every combination of 76.2mm gun on the main turret he could thing of - there was only one.  That was two or three years ago I last looked.

It irritates me that someone can take money from good folks in exchange for such bad castings.

The Battlefield ones with the hex Berliet turrets posted by dadlamassu are very, very nicely painted - possibly for German use with the dark grey?  But I think the suspension length is a little short, the front idlers should be forward more.  With the vertical instead of gently sloped driver's view port it looks a little shorter than it should be, but I would take this product any day over the Gaming Models one.  The rivets are not as grievously oversized either.  :)

That Peter Pig model certainly does the business as well.

Offline Gothic Line

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 411
Re: So darn cute FT-17
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2017, 12:58:49 AM »

 Really nice tank,a must in any collection or wargames table  :) they should have made the rear structure optional as it was not always used.I think the Germans removed it from some of their captured ones,(that fought in Paris 1944).

Offline Ultravanillasmurf

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 9305
    • Ultravanillasmurf
Re: So darn cute FT-17
« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2017, 08:20:31 AM »
Really nice tank,a must in any collection or wargames table  :) they should have made the rear structure optional as it was not always used.I think the Germans removed it from some of their captured ones,(that fought in Paris 1944).
Probably not expecting trenches.

Offline Gothic Line

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 411
Re: So darn cute FT-17
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2017, 07:09:18 PM »

 Still some retained it,maybe to store all the kit,etc.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
19 Replies
3979 Views
Last post August 07, 2009, 09:57:04 AM
by Commander Vyper
2 Replies
1573 Views
Last post October 04, 2011, 02:21:59 AM
by Marine0846
2 Replies
1049 Views
Last post April 12, 2014, 12:16:31 AM
by Conquistador
7 Replies
2127 Views
Last post July 08, 2015, 06:22:57 PM
by mikedemana
15 Replies
3607 Views
Last post August 09, 2017, 03:33:15 PM
by Svennn