Yeah, I'm trying to remember where it was I read that. I do remember that it said that Russia never completely trusted the Poles and expected them to run or even turn as soon as they came into contact with the enemy.
They would rather use the East Germans and their own cannonfodder in the Northern corridor, keeping Polish forces as deep defense, and to sweep conquered terrain behind the frontline troops.
Sounds plausible, but also, knowing Russian tactics (still) involve waves of expendables, followed by crack troops to break the enemy's spine, it's equally plausible that they would drive the Poles over the expected mine fields and nuclear wasteland to spare their own troops.
So since I am unable to produce the source of my information, we'll go with the latter instead

And yes; even when I was serving (late nineties), Dutch militairy still had a touch of the maverick, often reacting really flexible to tactical situations. I've always put that on the fact that conscripted armies, while on paper usually poorer trained than a professional one, employs men (at the time) from all walks of life, feeding new ideas, insights and initiative into the command structure. You'd have college graduates rubbing shoulders with last chance street kids (army or jail). They all learned from eachother and made for a better unit because of it.
Our current professional army is much more monochrome, and it shows...
Cracking pictures of the table too btw
