*

Recent Topics

Author Topic: Over the Hills - Play-test  (Read 2089 times)

Offline carojon

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1258
    • JJ's Wargames
Over the Hills - Play-test
« on: 22 October 2016, 02:29:04 PM »
One of the more recent additions to the catalogue of Napoleonic rule sets 'Over the Hills' got a play-test last night



If you would like to know more then just follow the link to JJ's

http://jjwargames.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/over-hills-napoleonic-rules-play-test.html

Jonathan
Often it is better to remain silent and let people think you are stupid than to open your mouth and remove all possible doubt.

http://jjwargames.blogspot.co.uk

Offline gustav

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 211
Re: Over the Hills - Play-test
« Reply #1 on: 30 October 2016, 01:07:20 AM »
interesting review JJ.  hmm food for thought indeed.

Offline carojon

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1258
    • JJ's Wargames
Re: Over the Hills - Play-test
« Reply #2 on: 30 October 2016, 06:13:19 PM »
Cheers gustav. Well worth having a look at.

Offline LCpl McDoom

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scientist
  • *
  • Posts: 233
Re: Over the Hills - Play-test
« Reply #3 on: 08 November 2016, 11:22:13 AM »
Thanks for the review, I succumbed and ordered a copy.

You mentioned you used micro dice to record FH at unit level - may I ask what were the typical min/max ranges of FH incurred? To explain my interest, I'll admit to being a bit fussy about having too many markers on the tabletop to manage information as the game progresses, so I sometimes look for alternate ways to 'mark casualties'.

Offline carojon

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1258
    • JJ's Wargames
Re: Over the Hills - Play-test
« Reply #4 on: 09 November 2016, 08:17:16 AM »
Hi Lc McDoom,
On the basis of the one play test we did for the post that is a tricky question to be precise about.
I took a judgement that most units that are well trained regular troops are going to be on a FS of 7-8, thus a d6 to record degradation of that rating should be more than adequate for the majority of units as a FS of 0 removes the unit. I use 18mm figures and like you I don't like markers that draw the eye away from the figures so I use 5mm (the smallest) micro dice available and I don't think having even two of the dice behind a unit would be that distracting, although I would suggest that that is very unlikely as that would only apply to those very elite units and most players concentrate on rallying off FH when they threaten to remove a unit or make it inoperative. Remember it is the army FS that cannot be rallied off and will stop units in an affected formation from carrying on the battle.

Obviously beauty is in the eye of the beholder which is why I posted the pictures of our game with the micro die in action, to allow others to make their own minds up. Personally I don't find they detract from the aesthetics of the game.

Hope that helps
JJ

Offline LCpl McDoom

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scientist
  • *
  • Posts: 233
Re: Over the Hills - Play-test
« Reply #5 on: 11 November 2016, 10:13:52 AM »
Many thanks for the reply, and aye, agreed - the pix you have posted up look impressive.

Rules arrived yesterday (thanks Caliver Books) and I was up past midnight reading and re-reading. I am now very intrigued to see how they work, and I like the fact that you have a Basic Game format to learn them quickly, and then you have a whole range of Optional Rules too. 

Offline carojon

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1258
    • JJ's Wargames
Re: Over the Hills - Play-test
« Reply #6 on: 11 November 2016, 12:19:50 PM »
I hope you have fun. I to spent a lot of time pre-reading and the re-reading after our game. I have come away with lots of ideas and am looking forward to having another go with them, time permitting. So much to do, so little time!
Cheers
JJ

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
8 Replies
1433 Views
Last post 03 November 2017, 03:04:13 PM
by carojon
5 Replies
1033 Views
Last post 17 November 2017, 11:45:36 AM
by Jabba
0 Replies
799 Views
Last post 06 December 2017, 07:58:13 AM
by carojon
4 Replies
881 Views
Last post 23 December 2017, 07:46:15 PM
by SABOT
3 Replies
1079 Views
Last post 17 January 2018, 04:39:41 PM
by Marine0846