*

Recent Topics

Author Topic: FT for Operation Sea Lion  (Read 3252 times)

Offline Ultravanillasmurf

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10276
    • Ultravanillasmurf
FT for Operation Sea Lion
« on: 24 April 2017, 07:51:43 AM »
I am in the process of painting up an Empress Miniatures FT tank as a tank brought out of mothballs and pressed into British service after the Fall of France.

I was wondering if anyone had thoughts on where markings would be applied. So far it has War Department number and a bridge loading circle (the weight class needs changing, to seven and a steady hand). The loading circle I think is on the wrong side.






An obvious addition would be identification symbols, in France white squares were applied, but where on the hull?

Any suggestions gratefully received.

The Bovington example is a machine gun armed version with the conical turret, this has the low pressure gun and the hexagonal turret.



Progress so far can be found here: http://ultravanillasmurf.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/FT
« Last Edit: 24 April 2017, 08:02:42 AM by Ultravanillasmurf »

Offline Captain Blood

  • Global Moderator
  • Elder God
  • Posts: 19742
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #1 on: 24 April 2017, 08:17:20 AM »
Can't help you with the information I'm afraid, but it's an intriguing idea... you've now got me thinking about whether I ought to add a repurposed French vehicle or two to my (fairly ahistorical) British WW2 desert force. They must have picked a few up in Syria...

Offline Ultravanillasmurf

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10276
    • Ultravanillasmurf
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #2 on: 24 April 2017, 08:52:52 AM »
Were they better than the Italian tanks they did use?

The Americans faced Vichy French ones at one point.

I was very tempted to add the Empress Miniatures FT deal to my purchases at Salute (shortage of carrying capacity was one reason not to) and build the Bovington example, an M1917 (for a Not "The Grasshopper Lies Heavy"  scenario), and a German one.

Offline Arlequín

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 6218
  • Culpame de la Bossa Nova...
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #3 on: 24 April 2017, 09:54:11 AM »
Nice start on the FT. Would it be likely that it would be used by those French troops who opted not to be repatriated after the surrender though? Which would mean you could stick to French markings. I think the white squares you are thinking of are actually 'gas paint' squares, like you have by the driver's hatch; they turn a mucky yellow when they come into contact with gas.
 
They must have picked a few up in Syria...

There were some 30 or so in Syria and the Lebanon, but really only fit for the knacker's yard, I don't think they even left their depots. The Free French took over some captured R35 tanks for ''1e Compagnie de Chars de Combat de la France Libre" though, but I have no idea whether they later used them in action in the desert, or as training tanks. Certainly they had been re-equipped with Crusaders by the time of El Alamein.   

Offline Captain Blood

  • Global Moderator
  • Elder God
  • Posts: 19742
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #4 on: 24 April 2017, 09:57:33 AM »
Interesting. Thanks for the info Jim. Maybe I won't bother with that then...  ;)

Offline SABOT

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Mastermind
  • *
  • Posts: 1664
  • " Keep Loading !"
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #5 on: 24 April 2017, 10:21:35 AM »
Very interesting subject and info lads.

Offline lou passejaire

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1274
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #6 on: 24 April 2017, 10:41:00 AM »
bad choice of French stuff , IMO ...
return of Narvik, the H39 of the 342th tank company became Free French 1st tank company, and some remain in UK till early 1941 . The only French stuff in UK was :
artillery tractors P107 and 75mm guns
12 H39 tanks - some Lorraine 37 - Somua MCL
Renault UE - Peugeot small trucks, and some cars
13th Legion Half Brigade ...
Sailors and Marines .

stop dreaming about the FT beeing repatriated after the Dunkirk desaster , most were used as blockade against Kradschutzen  :?
the last Somua 40 and Panhard 178 worth the value, not the FT ... even if it's one of the best choice in BA  lol

so your FT can be a model issued to UK in 1917 as a test , and put back to use after the Dunkirk disaster ...  ;)


Dans les situations critiques, quand on parle avec un calibre bien en pogne, personne ne conteste plus. Y'a des statistiques là-dessus.

Offline commissarmoody

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 8861
    • Moodys Adventures
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #7 on: 24 April 2017, 11:45:20 AM »
Or just say it belongs to a museum or a private collector volunteers his little tank to the war effort.
"Peace" is that brief, glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.

- Anonymous

Offline Ultravanillasmurf

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10276
    • Ultravanillasmurf
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #8 on: 24 April 2017, 02:36:23 PM »
Or just say it belongs to a museum or a private collector volunteers his little tank to the war effort.

It is " a tank brought out of mothballs and pressed into British service after the Fall of France".

It might have been a gate guard or left at the back of a barracks (or a private collector's pride and joy, I did not think of that)and not sent for scrap like the other World War One survivors.

I am surprised that any hardware got off the beach,

Offline Ballardian

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1585
  • Too old to stop now
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #9 on: 24 April 2017, 03:19:21 PM »
If pressed into British service I'd assume it'd follow the standard layout for the markings - Here's Bovingtons A13 & Vickers Light MKVII - they both have pretty much the same positioning. You could easily argue for (or against) the presence of pre-existing French markings (was it in use by one of the French units evacuated) so I imagine that there's some flexibility, hope that's of some use!

 

Offline Ultravanillasmurf

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10276
    • Ultravanillasmurf
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #10 on: 24 April 2017, 03:40:25 PM »
(Edited to correct troop/squadron error)
Excellent, thanks.

No French markings (I have only late War stuff from Rubicon models).

As I guessed, I put the weight class on the wrong side.

Not sure if that is the white identity square on the front (as mentioned in the description of the A11 in the New Vanguard book on the Matildas) as it appears to have a D troop squadron (HQ?) Diamond on the turret side which I thought was a later feature. The A13 is first vehicle A troop squadron.

The coloured square with the number (tactical sign?) I will replicate using a late War square painted over and a white number sourced from somewhere (vague).
« Last Edit: 25 April 2017, 07:39:45 AM by Ultravanillasmurf »

Offline fred

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 5305
    • Miniature Gaming
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #11 on: 24 April 2017, 07:29:01 PM »
I think the large white squares on early war tanks were for gas detection, not organisational markings.

The coloured square, with a number where known as serial numbers - late war they were to a standard scheme, early war there was much more variance, but red was very common for armoured regiments.

The geometric shapes on the turrets were the tactical marks, colour for squadron, shape for troop.

A web page of mine with some details on http://www.kerynne.com/games/BritishArmouredRegimentTOE.html



Offline Ultravanillasmurf

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10276
    • Ultravanillasmurf
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #12 on: 24 April 2017, 10:43:14 PM »
Sorry.

I must engage brain before typing...
I must engage brain before typing...
I must engage brain before typing...
I must engage brain before typing...

Yup squadron, not troop (I blame too much Command Decision in my youth....).

The geometric shape is the squadron mark, colour is regiment precedence, shape is squadron.

As I mentioned, the BEF specific 12" white Identification square is described on plates A and B1 in the Matilda book, as is the gas detection panel on plate A.


Offline Etranger

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 917
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #13 on: 25 April 2017, 12:19:06 AM »
I think the large white squares on early war tanks were for gas detection, not organisational markings.

The coloured square, with a number where known as serial numbers - late war they were to a standard scheme, early war there was much more variance, but red was very common for armoured regiments.

The geometric shapes on the turrets were the tactical marks, colour for squadron, shape for troop.

....

The white square was the BEF recognition marking. There was often an irregular 'blob' of light green gas detector plate somewhere on the front glacis plate (bonnet for softskins). That yellowish patch on yours would be around the right colour and position.

Don't fret too much about the position of the bridge classification plate (the yellow circle) as it could vary, particularly on a non-standard vehicle.
« Last Edit: 25 April 2017, 12:21:49 AM by Etranger »
"It's only a flesh wound...."

Offline Ultravanillasmurf

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10276
    • Ultravanillasmurf
Re: FT for Operation Sea Lion
« Reply #14 on: 25 April 2017, 07:59:03 AM »
@fred, thanks for the link, very interesting. That will be useful when I start on the Rubicon M10 so I know what RA regiment to use.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
2709 Views
Last post 15 April 2012, 10:45:02 AM
by fastolfrus
1 Replies
2697 Views
Last post 11 June 2007, 10:06:49 PM
by Maenoferren
6 Replies
1934 Views
Last post 09 May 2017, 11:42:24 AM
by Chris Abbey
9 Replies
2687 Views
Last post 12 July 2017, 04:40:20 PM
by surdu
26 Replies
3217 Views
Last post 25 September 2017, 07:30:54 PM
by Driscoles