*

Recent Topics

Author Topic: Charles I  (Read 4586 times)

Offline joroas

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 7802
Charles I
« on: 04 May 2010, 10:12:07 PM »
News from Warlord:

Quote
Warlord Games We've been entertaining royalty today - Charles I was being pressed into a master mould. And no, he doesn't come with a detachable head...
  lol
'So do all who see such times. But that is not for us to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that we are given.'

Offline timg

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 416
Re: Charles I
« Reply #1 on: 04 May 2010, 10:44:07 PM »
Lol, very good!

Offline Yankeepedlar01

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2390
    • http://talesfromghq.blogspot.com/2011/11/you-are-very-welcome-at-tales-from-ghq.html
Re: Charles I
« Reply #2 on: 05 May 2010, 08:30:46 AM »
I've seen him, I'm sure you'll like him, but he's not got a detachable head! :D
"There is no point in being stupid unless you show it!"

http://talesfromghq.blogspot.co.uk/

Offline Galloping Major

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2434
    • www.gallopingmajorwargames.com
Re: Charles I
« Reply #3 on: 05 May 2010, 08:50:13 AM »
"The man of blood", pre being improved by head detachment.

Should be popular with womantically wong woyalists  lol

Look forward to seeing the figure.
« Last Edit: 05 May 2010, 08:57:11 AM by Galloping Major »


Offline joroas

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 7802
Re: Charles I
« Reply #4 on: 05 May 2010, 09:43:37 AM »
Quote
I've seen him, I'm sure you'll like him, but he's not got a detachable head!

Nothing a sharp razor saw couldn't correct........  lol

Offline Doc Twilight

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1560
  • We have no time for Trucers!
    • Black Army Productions
Re: Charles I
« Reply #5 on: 05 May 2010, 09:45:28 AM »
About the time the good guys got representation....

Dig up Cromwell and fill him full of more holes, I say;) If there's anything left of old Wartyface.

-Doc

Offline Galloping Major

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2434
    • www.gallopingmajorwargames.com
Re: Charles I
« Reply #6 on: 05 May 2010, 10:43:14 AM »
Too late mate: isn't that pretty much what Chas II did after the restoration?

Actually, during the part of the First Civil War I find most appealing, Cromwell was 2IC of the Eastern Association Army, Thomas Fairfax, William Waller, Philip Skippon etc were far more prominent than he.

The King, however, was still the king, not neccessarily the worst monarch we ever had, but not far off - certainly far from being a good guy.

To paraphrase 1066 and All That: Woyalists, womantic but wrong.  lol

Offline Plynkes

  • The Royal Bastard
  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10317
  • I killed Mufasa!
    • http://misterplynkes.blogspot.com/
Re: Charles I
« Reply #7 on: 05 May 2010, 10:47:00 AM »
Good guys, my arse.
With Cat-Like Tread
Upon our prey we steal...

Offline Doc Twilight

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1560
  • We have no time for Trucers!
    • Black Army Productions
Re: Charles I
« Reply #8 on: 05 May 2010, 11:02:36 AM »
Too late mate: isn't that pretty much what Chas II did after the restoration?

Actually, during the part of the First Civil War I find most appealing, Cromwell was 2IC of the Eastern Association Army, Thomas Fairfax, William Waller, Philip Skippon etc were far more prominent than he.

The King, however, was still the king, not neccessarily the worst monarch we ever had, but not far off - certainly far from being a good guy.

To paraphrase 1066 and All That: Woyalists, womantic but wrong.  lol

Yes, he did indeed.

My Irish grandmother had a particular love of Cromwell... or was that a particular hatred?;)

I'm not saying Chaz was fantastic, but I don't think the fellows who replaced him were any better.

-Doc

Offline joroas

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 7802
Re: Charles I
« Reply #9 on: 05 May 2010, 11:03:39 AM »
Quote
not neccessarily the worst monarch we ever had, but not far off

Not sure that I agree, a typical younger son left with a job he was not prepared for, having had an upbringing that told him he was a little god and having been ashamed of his father's dissolute lifestyle and adopting, therefore, an incredibly moral stance.  Misguided, maybe, shy and uncomfortable, certainly, stubborn, absolutely, but a bad person, I'm not sure.  I liken him to Nicholas II, a good guy but in the wrong job at the wrong time and inheriting a wealth of bad karma from previous monarchs.

Offline Galloping Major

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2434
    • www.gallopingmajorwargames.com
Re: Charles I
« Reply #10 on: 05 May 2010, 12:59:29 PM »
Not sure that I agree, a typical younger son left with a job he was not prepared for, having had an upbringing that told him he was a little god and having been ashamed of his father's dissolute lifestyle and adopting, therefore, an incredibly moral stance.  Misguided, maybe, shy and uncomfortable, certainly, stubborn, absolutely, but a bad person, I'm not sure.  I liken him to Nicholas II, a good guy but in the wrong job at the wrong time and inheriting a wealth of bad karma from previous monarchs.

I must say, that's about the most reasonable defence of him I've come across so far  ;)

Still, you have to have an enemy to fight in a war, so no doubt he'll be a popular choice.  :)

Offline ushistoryprof

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 872
    • World Historyprof-History Real & Imagined through Miniatures
Re: Charles I
« Reply #11 on: 05 May 2010, 05:31:50 PM »
About the time the good guys got representation....

Dig up Cromwell and fill him full of more holes, I say;) If there's anything left of old Wartyface.

-Doc

Then hang and tar the body-death is too good for him. (He was a good general though too damn good actually).

Offline Plynkes

  • The Royal Bastard
  • Elder God
  • Posts: 10317
  • I killed Mufasa!
    • http://misterplynkes.blogspot.com/
Re: Charles I
« Reply #12 on: 05 May 2010, 05:44:37 PM »
Funny how these Yankee-Doodle-Dandies are so keen for us Brits to be saddled with an absolute monarchy and the Divine Rights of Kings. Weren't so damn eager for it for themselves, as I recall.

Bleedin' hypocrites.    ;)

Offline ushistoryprof

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 872
    • World Historyprof-History Real & Imagined through Miniatures
Re: Charles I
« Reply #13 on: 05 May 2010, 05:49:00 PM »
Funny how these Yankee-Doodle-Dandies are so keen for us Brits to be saddled with an absolute monarchy and the Divine Rights of Kings. Weren't so damn eager for it for themselves, as I recall.

Bleedin' hypocrites.    ;)
Better you than us, besides tradition is so much more important in the Old World, to many over here have no respect for the ideas of the past.

Offline Operator5

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 3344
  • The Silent Sentinel
    • Rattrap Productions LLC
Re: Charles I
« Reply #14 on: 05 May 2010, 05:52:30 PM »
Funny how these Yankee-Doodle-Dandies are so keen for us Brits to be saddled with an absolute monarchy and the Divine Rights of Kings. Weren't so damn eager for it for themselves, as I recall.

Bleedin' hypocrites.    ;)
I'd be more than happy to be declared absolute monarch over here. Anyone else would just be a pretender to the throne.  lol
Richard A. Johnson
On Facebook: Rattrap on Facebook

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
6 Replies
2187 Views
Last post 30 October 2011, 07:56:21 PM
by Anderson Collection
5 Replies
2009 Views
Last post 13 August 2012, 10:47:49 PM
by H.M.Stanley
4 Replies
1919 Views
Last post 11 January 2013, 02:30:24 PM
by Atheling
20 Replies
5356 Views
Last post 19 May 2013, 08:40:17 AM
by OSHIROmodels
1 Replies
1741 Views
Last post 30 July 2013, 02:33:22 PM
by Vern