Approach Woking with caution - A VBCW battle report

[Eric the Shed]

Latest battle report up on the blog

http://shedwars.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/recon.html







cheers

[jp1885]

Brilliant stuff - bravo sir! 

[Eric the Shed]

cheers jp

[scrivs]

Great stuff.

[pocoloco]

Very nice AAR, love the terrain and the minis 

What kind of stats did you use for the opposing forces?

[Eric the Shed]

Not too sure what you mean by stats  -

Both troops were regular units

The Army lists were just thrown together - I hate having contrived and balanced forces unless it is a straight engagement

[pocoloco]

By stats I mean what unit types you used for the forces. Has somebody made Bolt Action army lists for the AVBCW setting?

[Eric the Shed]

Sorry I now understand

No army lists exist that I know of

I just threw together the forces randomly

[Doug ex-em4]

Sorry I now understand

No army lists exist that I know of

I just threw together the forces randomly

That's the spirit - to Hell with army lists, points and other such corsetry. I commend your approach, Giles....I think most of us can extrapolate from a rule set and make up acceptable lists, forces, sides, scenarios etc....

Doug

[pocoloco]

Oh, I'm all for irregular and unbalanced scenarios and campaigns, just curious what kind of stats were given to each unit type

[Doug ex-em4]

Aquote author=pocoloco link=topic=65475.msg791815#msg791815 date=1397128324]
Oh, I'm all for irregular and unbalanced scenarios and campaigns, just curious what kind of stats were given to each unit type
[/quote]

Fair point - looking back at my post on the subject, I came on a bit strong. No offence intended. Looks like we have a similar view anyway.

Doug

[pocoloco]

None take good Sir.

I like the scenario based gaming most, with un-equal forces included into the mix if possible. Makes it all more fun, I think.

[Phil Robinson]

Splendid, ticks all the boxes for VBCW for me.