*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 30, 2024, 11:26:34 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Donate

We Appreciate Your Support

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 1695647
  • Total Topics: 118702
  • Online Today: 391
  • Online Ever: 2235
  • (October 29, 2023, 01:32:45 AM)
Users Online

Recent

Author Topic: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread  (Read 1738644 times)

Offline matthais-mouse

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 903
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2325 on: December 01, 2014, 11:48:02 AM »
who is buying this crap? Seriously a grand for a dragon...

I hope no one buys this and they realise just how ridiculous they have become as a company. This will probably not happen but we can hope haha.
.: Logan's band of survivors of the battle of Ursun's teeth :.

For blog posts with more info here.....
http://let-the-galaxy-burn-again.blogspot.co.uk/
And the vlogs here....
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzyMQNtc1ANwIbEN80M-gwA

Offline Tactalvanic

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1579
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2326 on: December 01, 2014, 12:19:00 PM »
There are already better dragon models available

They deserve a fail with that level of insanity pricing.

No doubt some die-hard fanatic cult of GW members will actually mortgage their souls/houses/children/kidneys accordingly but this is such a kick in their own armoured drop pods its ridiculous.

I cannot begin to imagine the calculations/sales prediction they came up with to justify the price.

Can only assume that they expect to sell so few that its up that high  to do the usual and attempt to pay for the costs, from tiny sales numbers.

Is it limited edition by the way? The mini, not the price that is..

Back to work and eye-ing up the Mantic KOW rules kickstarter thing on the side..

 

Offline Vermis

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2433
    • Mini Sculpture
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2327 on: December 01, 2014, 12:33:48 PM »
It doesn't offend my eyes, but then I think that's more down to Weta and John Howe and the fact I think this is a pretty kickass dragon design. It almost makes me want to go see the movies. Almost. This blurry pic of a model is already better than just about every dragon GW has ever put out, and miles better than most of them. (I mean, remember the first LotR dragon from GW? Brrr.)

The sculpt, though, does seem a bit stiff in places. And from what I can see someone's gone with the tired (exhausted) cliche of layering concrete shingles all up and down the top and bottom of it's neck. On a character design that doesn't have them. And specifically stated to have a soft underside... :?

And yeah. £500. Erm, no.

There are already better dragon models available

To be fair: not many.

Offline Tactalvanic

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1579
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2328 on: December 01, 2014, 12:47:09 PM »
To be fair: not many.

Very true, but one is still enough - and still cheaper.

Still, it is certainly better than any they did before, but as you say thats probably due to having someone else's designs to copy?

And it needs more legs..

And I don't see many skulls lying round...

-

Could not resist, had a quick bounce around GW website

Again.

Those prices are just  :o

Glad to see I am still immune to temptation and unsuitable for Cult GW membership indoctrination at this time.



Offline Vermis

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2433
    • Mini Sculpture
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2329 on: December 01, 2014, 01:43:14 PM »
Still, it is certainly better than any they did before, but as you say thats probably due to having someone else's designs to copy?

I have a sneaking feeling this is a Trish Carden sculpt, seeing as she is (or was) GW's go-to (reptile) monster sculptor, and the fact someone couldn't resist those roof tiles. If that's the case, see what can happen when things are steered away from her usual old dragon-rote?

Quote
And it needs more legs...

:D

To be honest I was never very convinced by the over-earnest never-the-twain-shall-meet classification of dragons vs. wyverns (vs. drakes, vs. wyrms, vs. whatever), especially when so many sculptors and artists lack the ability or the will to make either look convincing.

Offline Ajsalium

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 696
    • Role 'n' Roll
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2330 on: December 01, 2014, 01:50:21 PM »
To be honest I was never very convinced by the over-earnest never-the-twain-shall-meet classification of dragons vs. wyverns (vs. drakes, vs. wyrms, vs. whatever), especially when so many sculptors and artists lack the ability or the will to make either look convincing.

Come on, Vermis. You do know that dragons have separate arms and wings...

Blog updated Jan 21st
ROLE 'N' ROLL

Tell the truth, do what's right, and face the consequences. -Me.

Offline Tactalvanic

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1579
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2331 on: December 01, 2014, 02:49:46 PM »
Apart from picking fun, not worried really about forelegs, twolegs, four legs, no legs or otherwise.

I think we pretty much all  agree overall its not a bad likeness to Smaugenbach - its just not worth handing over that amount of money.


Offline Vermis

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2433
    • Mini Sculpture
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2332 on: December 01, 2014, 02:57:53 PM »
:)

Come on, Vermis. You do know that dragons have separate arms and wings...



 lol Somehow I knew that was going to be Trogdor before I clicked on it. I swear too many people use Strongbad's instructions, too. (The number of dragons with beefy arms coming out of their necks...)

Offline Mr Brown

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 249
    • Speartips and Spaceships
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2333 on: December 02, 2014, 06:32:34 PM »
The marines are now on 32mm bases so you'll have to either rebase your mareen army or buy a new one...

Well obviously you don't 'need' to but I wonder how many kids will be misled into telling mum and dad that they 'need' more models. Just in time for Christmas.

Wait that sounds overly cynical...  lol

Offline beefcake

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 7465
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2334 on: December 02, 2014, 06:41:15 PM »
Even though Smaug is going to be horrendously priced it will sell well. The officially licensed Smaug Miniature that looks like the one from the movies is going to draw in more than just the wargaming crowd even at that price. At half the price I am sure they would sell a tonne more (maybe not make more of a profit though, I don't know the margins). It's beyond me caring really though as even if I could get it at the cost of the resin to make it I wouldn't as I think that would still be too much for me. Plus I have nowhere to put it.

Just a thought. Can you imagine a LOTR collector that has very little knowledge of resin, paying for this, paying for a professional painjob, then sitting it above their fireplace with a roaring fire going? That wouldn't end well.


Offline eilif

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2383
    • Chicago Skirmish Wargames
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2335 on: December 02, 2014, 08:32:43 PM »
Even though Smaug is going to be horrendously priced it will sell well. The officially licensed Smaug Miniature that looks like the one from the movies is going to draw in more than just the wargaming crowd even at that price...

...Just a thought. Can you imagine a LOTR collector that has very little knowledge of resin, paying for this, paying for a professional painjob, then sitting it above their fireplace with a roaring fire going? That wouldn't end well.
These LotR/Hobbit prices make it pretty obvious that GW is deliberatly prioritizing the collector and LotR fan over the wargamer.  An uber-fan is going to be willing to slap down uber-bucks for a display piece or just something to add to the MISB boxes of collectibles in the closet.  The prices are just too high to sustain a large player base.

Of course there hasn't been a large player base for LoTR/Hobbit SBG for a few years now, so maybe this is just what GW has to do to make the license pay off.

The marines are now on 32mm bases so you'll have to either rebase your mareen army or buy a new one...

Well obviously you don't 'need' to but I wonder how many kids will be misled into telling mum and dad that they 'need' more models. Just in time for Christmas.

Even GW doesn't require rebasing or rebuying.  Their standard for tournaments (used by many other tourneys) has always been that you can use the current base size or the base the model was sold with.  The new BA tac squats then will have to be on 32mm bases, but the only folks that will be rebasing will be those who want continuity across the line or genuinely prefer the larger bases.

Of course if you want to rebase, there's only one company making 32mm plastic bases right now and you know who that is and how much more they cost than 25mm slottas from a company like EM4.

Offline zemjw

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • *
  • Posts: 2140
    • My blog
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2336 on: December 02, 2014, 08:45:40 PM »
Quote
paying for a professional painjob

Sadly an all too accurate description of working with F***cast :'(

Offline Mr Brown

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 249
    • Speartips and Spaceships
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2337 on: December 02, 2014, 08:47:59 PM »
Note that my post was decidedly tongue in cheek regarding the 'need' to rebase. It's a current trend that gw have built on over the last year or so to introduce new or unusual base sizes.

As for your second point about the number of manufacturers making 32mm bases? There was definitely more than one prior to the announcement that gw would use them for the new BA models. After the announcement? I'm sure there are now loads of third parties willing to jump on the 32mm wagon!  ;D

Offline beefcake

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 7465
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2338 on: December 02, 2014, 10:16:33 PM »
Sadly an all too accurate description of working with F***cast :'(

lol, didn't even notice the typo.

Offline zemjw

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • *
  • Posts: 2140
    • My blog
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2339 on: December 03, 2014, 08:50:45 AM »
There are two things that worry me about the new base sizes:

1. It implies that figure creep has now become so bad that they've had to increase the base size to stop it looking too silly
2. They're giving themselves more room for future scale creep

Perhaps the 54mm Inquisitor figures from years ago weren't a one off, but were in fact a few blisters from the future that had fallen through a wormhole onto a GW staffer's desk.

It all makes sense now o_o

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
73 Replies
20255 Views
Last post June 20, 2008, 06:41:42 PM
by TJSKI
26 Replies
16221 Views
Last post January 18, 2015, 10:23:57 AM
by Arlequín
250 Replies
91081 Views
Last post June 19, 2015, 03:11:30 AM
by syrinx0
146 Replies
22619 Views
Last post February 08, 2018, 04:50:06 PM
by Bahir
36 Replies
6325 Views
Last post February 16, 2022, 03:51:55 PM
by Easy E