I found it an interesting read but had nothing to compare it with so was blind to any flaws it may have had. There were plenty of quotes from impressed reviewers on the cover but they may have had much the same problem I did. One thing that did frustrate me a little was the amount of coverage on cultural issues which, while not uninteresting, didn’t really seem to belong there. I was also surprised to find no reference to Arditi - at least under that name, unless my memory is faulty - or that great Italian invention, the sub-machine gun. Otherwise the military aspects appeared to be covered well enough.
The issue with Thompson’s writing isn’t so much the general overview of Italian front, but rather the personal crusade he endeavors upon to portray the Italian army, and Cadorna in particular, in the worst way possible. Thompson finds whatever negative anecdote he can about the Italian army under Cadorna and uses it to craft the picture of a dysfunctional, demoralized force led by stupid, backwards leaders. The Italian army certainly had its problems during the Great War, and Cadorna definitely dealt insurmountable harm to his men’s morale, but many of the claims Thompson makes are either confirmed to be fabricated, or somehow Thompson has access to sources nobody else has seen and that he doesn't feel like sharing. One particular gripe I have with Thompson’s hyperbolic depiction is the admiration of Luigi Capello. While Capello did disagree with Cadorna’s operational decisions, once given command during the 10th and 11th battles of the Isonzo he managed to rack up even more horrendous casualty figures with less to show than Cadorna (something not mentioned by Thompson). As such, Thompson’s portrayal of the Italian army and Cadorna is more of a caricature rather than a characterization.