*

Recent Topics

Author Topic: Air combat - shot in the dark  (Read 4186 times)

Offline gweirda

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 206
    • Brawlfactory
Air combat - shot in the dark
« on: 11 August 2015, 11:30:45 PM »
I've finally 'joined the club' here, but don't worry: I have no intention of spoiling it for anyone.

My interest lies in air combat, and I simply wondered whether there were any members here who didn't already know about me (and my strange ideas) who would be willing to discuss the subject.

For those whose sphincters tightened and mouths went dry upon seeing my username, you may rest assured: I won't be bothering you with anything unsolicited, and I trust that my being open about my identity and presence will give you enough to steer clear of my posts.

Offline von Lucky

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 8794
  • Melbourne, Australia
    • Donner und Blitzen Wargaming
Re: Air combat - shot in the dark
« Reply #1 on: 13 August 2015, 02:35:44 PM »
Okay, I'll bite. What are your strange ideas for air combat?
- Karsten

"Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality."
- Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland

Blog: Donner und Blitzen

Offline gweirda

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 206
    • Brawlfactory
Re: Air combat - shot in the dark
« Reply #2 on: 14 August 2015, 03:16:35 PM »
The idea that inspired the concept is the equivalence in thinking between martial artists involved in hand-to-hand combat (including the use of non-ranged weapons...swords and knives and whatever) and pilots involved in air combat.  In the heat of battle both rely on training, instinct, and/or experience to determine/execute the specific actions taken (sidestep, wingover, parry, etc...) rather than deliberate, conscious decision-making.

Accepting that as the premise, I'm looking at gaming air combat in the same manner as is usually done in hand-to-hand combat at its (commonly) most detailed level: something equivalent to an rpg's combat system.

The length of a turn could/would be similar to current air combat games...a few seconds at most...but the decisions/challenges faced by players would not revolve around the specific movement/placement of the aircraft model.  They would, rather, be concerned with answering tactical questions such as "Where do I want to be?" or "Who should I attack?" - the sort of decisions made, imho, by someone involved in a hand-to-hand brawl.

This sort of system seems to work well for rpgs and such without any great amount of clamoring from gamers demanding that rules should allow for them to decide every specific step and crouch and punch and thrust, and I think the same concept/framework could work in the air as well.

dunno...it's just an idea based on a premise: Testing it could easily show it to be a poor option, but I figure it's worth exploring if only for the chance of providing gamers another road to having fun with toys...

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
18 Replies
8954 Views
Last post 26 January 2011, 07:27:44 PM
by Comsquare
20 Replies
5033 Views
Last post 21 December 2011, 04:58:26 PM
by the commissar
3 Replies
2093 Views
Last post 09 February 2012, 08:28:01 PM
by Mad Padre
2 Replies
2235 Views
Last post 04 January 2013, 06:58:18 PM
by Legion1963
3 Replies
2019 Views
Last post 01 December 2014, 05:18:21 AM
by LeadAsbestos