*

Recent Topics

Author Topic: Warlords of Erehwon combat question  (Read 1306 times)

Offline pixelgeek

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2344
    • Zac's gaming blog
Warlords of Erehwon combat question
« on: 07 January 2021, 07:49:48 PM »
So am I mistaken or did Warlords of Erehwon used to have a rule where the losing side in a close combat took 1d6 additional pin markers?

Offline Wellington

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 293
Re: Warlords of Erehwon combat question
« Reply #1 on: 19 January 2021, 05:19:19 PM »
If you fail your break test, than you get 1d6 pins (see p 41)
A life without Samurai is possible, but not desirable!

Offline pixelgeek

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2344
    • Zac's gaming blog
Re: Warlords of Erehwon combat question
« Reply #2 on: 19 January 2021, 06:05:03 PM »
If you fail your break test, than you get 1d6 pins (see p 41)

The price of failure is more certain failure.

If I do get around to trying the rules I will certainly toss that out. Not sure why he added it since the rules work fine in other versions without it

Offline Wellington

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 293
Re: Warlords of Erehwon combat question
« Reply #3 on: 19 January 2021, 06:55:51 PM »
I think this rule is fine. Makes you think more about risking combat. 

Offline pixelgeek

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2344
    • Zac's gaming blog
Re: Warlords of Erehwon combat question
« Reply #4 on: 19 January 2021, 07:01:03 PM »
I think this rule is fine. Makes you think more about risking combat.

It just seems that it condemns broke units.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
1 Replies
2295 Views
Last post 10 December 2013, 05:58:04 PM
by The_Beast
6 Replies
1601 Views
Last post 11 August 2015, 07:11:25 PM
by Fencing Frog
7 Replies
4400 Views
Last post 02 January 2021, 01:00:45 PM
by Grumpy Gnome
2 Replies
1041 Views
Last post 08 January 2021, 09:52:42 AM
by zemjw
2 Replies
1442 Views
Last post 20 May 2021, 10:35:16 PM
by Kikuchiyo