*

Recent Topics

Author Topic: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread  (Read 2042340 times)

Offline grant

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 4165
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4425 on: 08 January 2016, 03:56:36 PM »
Wait ... they re-branded their stores 'Warhammer' because that's what its customers call it?
That's ... moronic.

3. Why rebrand to a name you have just nuked out of existence?

Is anyone actually steering this ship or is it basically just a shoelace tied to a steering wheel with a post-it note saying 'Out to lunch' ?

This pretty much sums up the state of GW and Warhammer.
It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words - Orwell, 1984

Offline Elbows

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 9970
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4426 on: 08 January 2016, 04:03:39 PM »
I always love this absolutely useless garbage language...corporate speak is such a ball of shite.

“We have made some good progress on our strategic initiatives all focused on delivering long-term growth.”


 lol
2025 Painted Miniatures: 348
('24: 502, '23: 159, '22: 214, '21: 148, '20: 207, '19: 123, '18: 98, '17: 226, '16: 233, '15: 32, '14: 116)

https://myminiaturemischief.blogspot.com
Find us at TurnStyle Games on Facebook!

Offline Vermis

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2433
    • Mini Sculpture
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4427 on: 08 January 2016, 04:22:24 PM »
2. Why spend so much money on a rebrand for such a ridiculous reason? Does Marks and Spencer plan to call its shops Marks and Sparks now? Will McDonalds call itself Maccy D's?

Or Kentucky Fried Chicken to KF... oh wait.  :D

More newspaper bits:

http://www.standard.co.uk/business/games-workshop-in-profit-warning-after-poor-christmas-a3151876.html

I like the way they mention that Warhammer World sells 'elf cakes', and the price of them. It's a wonderful mix of interest and complete irrelevance.

Offline zemjw

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • *
  • Posts: 2489
    • My blog
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4428 on: 08 January 2016, 04:27:13 PM »
Is that an official GW photo in the Standard?

I just wonder why the painter took a lot of time and effort over the clothing and then totally ignored the eyes ???

It's interesting that both articles have been illustrated with LOTR images, a game they've pretty much abandoned
« Last Edit: 08 January 2016, 04:39:46 PM by zemjw »

Offline Streetline

  • Librarian
  • Posts: 121
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4429 on: 08 January 2016, 04:29:18 PM »
I think serious financial journalists, steeely eyed veterans of a double dip recession, struggle when writing a piece on the warhammer company that sells warhammer in warhammer shops.

Even when they're patently not Warhammer, not warhammer shops and not selling.  hey ho.

JDE
Exeter Legionary - 7th May 2022 - Exeter Matford Centre
Games, traders,  bigger bring and buy every year
http://legionaryshow.co.uk/

Dim_Reaper

  • Guest
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4430 on: 08 January 2016, 04:31:01 PM »
3. Why rebrand to a name you have just nuked out of existence?

To avoid false advertising. According to themselves, they don't make games. Also, the word Warhammer doesn't have "work" in it, removing other commitments they don't give a shit about.

Offline Vermis

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2433
    • Mini Sculpture
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4431 on: 08 January 2016, 04:31:55 PM »
I think serious financial journalists, steeely eyed veterans of a double dip recession, struggle when writing a piece on the warhammer company that sells warhammer in warhammer shops.

Even when they're patently not Warhammer, not warhammer shops and not selling.  hey ho.

JDE

If there was ever a time when this forum really needed a 'like' button...

Offline Captain Blood

  • Global Moderator
  • Elder God
  • Posts: 19741
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4432 on: 08 January 2016, 04:50:20 PM »
Well profits may have been 'flat' over Christmas (i.e. they didn't make more than they did last year) but since they made £6M last year, that's still not too shabby. And £16M profit for the year as a whole last financial year. Certainly doesn't look like they're going down the tubes any time soon, does it? Despite the commentary wall of doom and despair here and elsewhere, GW is evidently still successfully selling an awful lot of baroque toy goblins and elves to somebody...  :)

Offline Vermis

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2433
    • Mini Sculpture
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4433 on: 08 January 2016, 05:31:43 PM »
Quote
Certainly doesn't look like they're going down the tubes any time soon, does it? Despite the commentary wall of doom and despair here and elsewhere

I don't think anyone has said they're going to fail right now. Not since a good while back, anyway!
I have to admit, Kevin Rountree's noises and stuff like discounted boxes are making me wonder if GW is suddenly becoming sober again - a bit like Jack in that episode of Father Ted. I'm sceptical that all that 6M, holding at 6M, is down to 'baroque goblins and elves' though. GW had another few tricks that it pulled out of it's hat.

Offline Connectamabob

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1028
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4434 on: 08 January 2016, 06:53:17 PM »
I have to admit, Kevin Rountree's noises and stuff like discounted boxes are making me wonder if GW is suddenly becoming sober again - a bit like Jack in that episode of Father Ted.

...And now I'm picturing a GW staff meeting where upper management's end is just "Feck!", "Arse!", "Drink!", "Gerls!", "Gobshyte!".
History viewed from the inside is always a dark, digestive mess, far different from the easily recognizable cow viewed from afar by historians.

Offline 3 fingers

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1246
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4435 on: 08 January 2016, 07:13:57 PM »
I always love this absolutely useless garbage language...corporate speak is such a ball of shite.

“We have made some good progress on our strategic initiatives all focused on delivering long-term growth.”


 lol

Sounds like a dilbert comic strip,lol

Offline Captain Blood

  • Global Moderator
  • Elder God
  • Posts: 19741
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4436 on: 08 January 2016, 07:16:50 PM »
I'm sceptical that all that 6M, holding at 6M, is down to 'baroque goblins and elves' though. GW had another few tricks that it pulled out of it's hat.

I was oversimplifying their product offer, I appreciate. I believe they do some spacey stuff too.
;)
Apart from a few paints, I am not and have never been a GW shopper.

Offline Tactalvanic

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1734
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4437 on: 08 January 2016, 07:45:29 PM »
That's a brilliant bit from the Guardian.

" It has appointed a recruitment expert to ensure a constant supply of store managers."

That's one way to "freeze" staff wages.


Oh and linky if I may direct to source

http://investor.games-workshop.com/2016/01/08/half-yearly-report-and-trading-update/

« Last Edit: 08 January 2016, 07:48:13 PM by Tactalvanic »

Offline Hupp n at em

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1492
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4438 on: 08 January 2016, 08:36:15 PM »
I always love this absolutely useless garbage language...corporate speak is such a ball of shite.

“We have made some good progress on our strategic initiatives all focused on delivering long-term growth.”


 lol


3. Why rebrand to a name you have just nuked out of existence?

Is anyone actually steering this ship or is it basically just a shoelace tied to a steering wheel with a post-it note saying 'Out to lunch' ?

To avoid false advertising. According to themselves, they don't make games. Also, the word Warhammer doesn't have "work" in it, removing other commitments they don't give a shit about.

... lol , that is all.

Offline rebelyell2006

  • Librarian
  • Posts: 143
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #4439 on: 08 January 2016, 09:34:51 PM »
That's a brilliant bit from the Guardian.

" It has appointed a recruitment expert to ensure a constant supply of store managers."

That's one way to "freeze" staff wages.


Oh and linky if I may direct to source

http://investor.games-workshop.com/2016/01/08/half-yearly-report-and-trading-update/



Is there a sufficiently high turnover with those jobs?  Or is this corporate speak for "we're switching our staff over to temporary/contract positions"?

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
73 Replies
30777 Views
Last post 20 June 2008, 06:41:42 PM
by TJSKI
26 Replies
22036 Views
Last post 18 January 2015, 10:23:57 AM
by Arlequín
250 Replies
106792 Views
Last post 19 June 2015, 03:11:30 AM
by syrinx0
146 Replies
38277 Views
Last post 08 February 2018, 04:50:06 PM
by Bahir
36 Replies
15878 Views
Last post 16 February 2022, 03:51:55 PM
by Easy E