*

Recent Topics

Author Topic: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread  (Read 2050307 times)

Offline Tactalvanic

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1734
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2940 on: 07 May 2015, 12:49:13 PM »
 :D Probably see it mentioned in the next financial statement, along with the other regular reasons as to why the revenue is falling.  :D

People not buying enough individual kits to represent all the load-out options, but instead, modifying GW kits to be more flexible/usable.

They are not GW hobby magnets, therefore you shouldn't do it. otherwise they would sell them to you wouldn't they? Like extra skulls?

Bad people/customers, bad. why else would they provide a special purchase option to get 5 in one click?

 o_o The extra bits are meant to go in your bits box and stay there, not on the end of magnets... o_o


Offline Tactalvanic

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1734
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2941 on: 10 May 2015, 08:37:33 AM »

Online beefcake

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 7707
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2942 on: 10 May 2015, 08:40:47 AM »
I like those. Good for use outside of 40k such as near future robots.


Offline OSHIROmodels

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Elder God
  • *
  • Posts: 28292
  • Custom terrain a speciality.
    • Oshiro modelterrain
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2943 on: 10 May 2015, 08:49:41 AM »
But they've spelt it wrong  ::)

'C' not 'K' you tossers  ;D

cheers

James

Offline Vanvlak

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 5310
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2944 on: 10 May 2015, 08:52:26 AM »
I like those. Good for use outside of 40k such as near future robots.
Me too, and it's nice to see the ancient ad mech robots back in the 40K universe. I'd leave the back-mounted gun out, though, although it was a feature of the old generation 40k robots too.
And Jimbibbly is correct about the spelling - unless they're pre-empting their use by orks, of course - which was possiblein the good old days......

Online beefcake

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 7707
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2945 on: 10 May 2015, 09:02:17 AM »
But they've spelt it wrong  ::)

'C' not 'K' you tossers  ;D

cheers

James
But it's kool spelling it that way.

Probably helps separate it from the vampire castellan they have.

Edit: which after checking is no longer there. Other castellans are however.
« Last Edit: 10 May 2015, 09:07:18 AM by beefcake »

Offline Steve F

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 3174
  • Pedantic bugger, apparently.
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2946 on: 10 May 2015, 09:19:26 AM »
It's probably easier to trademark if its not in the dictionary.  Those are the first new GW models I've unreservedly liked the look of since the plastic spirit host came out.
Back from the dead, almost.

Offline OSHIROmodels

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Elder God
  • *
  • Posts: 28292
  • Custom terrain a speciality.
    • Oshiro modelterrain
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2947 on: 10 May 2015, 09:21:30 AM »
Not that much 'skullz' and shit to remove either  :)

cheers

James

Offline 3 fingers

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1246
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2948 on: 10 May 2015, 11:32:35 AM »
Just to deviate,I noticed the empire free company's been out of stock for awhile now.

Online beefcake

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 7707
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2949 on: 10 May 2015, 11:46:22 AM »
I reckon they are not making any more stock of the current line and will wait until most of it is all sold out then bring in the new edition of WFB.

Offline Gibby

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2449
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2950 on: 10 May 2015, 12:08:55 PM »
Well, it really was the best value plastic kit they did. Can't have that upsetting the rest of the catalogue...

Offline 3 fingers

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1246
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2951 on: 10 May 2015, 12:11:03 PM »
Ah well,will have took elsewhere for some conversion fodder,then ::)

Offline Major_Gilbear

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 3195
  • God-Emperor of Dune
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2952 on: 10 May 2015, 03:11:02 PM »
Ah well,will have took elsewhere for some conversion fodder,then ::)

Check out the Perry's War of the Roses boxes - great value and similar/better models. ;)

Offline Tactalvanic

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1734
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2953 on: 10 May 2015, 03:23:55 PM »
Well, it really was the best value plastic kit they did. Can't have that upsetting the rest of the catalogue...

Shame.

off to the land of pro-painted and OOP, for them then.

Still. It's about the GW hobby not "value" remember.

Expect something else multi-part, different troop types possible, with less individual actual troops, soon, with the bonus of it not involving value.

e.g. "This multi-part kit contains enough multi-parts to make one of 20 different empire troop types. Horse sold seperately, extra skulls not included either"
 lol

Offline 3 fingers

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1246
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #2954 on: 10 May 2015, 05:09:32 PM »
I know of the perry stuff,wanted something bit chunkier.to look right with what I already have.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
73 Replies
30847 Views
Last post 20 June 2008, 06:41:42 PM
by TJSKI
26 Replies
22074 Views
Last post 18 January 2015, 10:23:57 AM
by Arlequín
250 Replies
106948 Views
Last post 19 June 2015, 03:11:30 AM
by syrinx0
146 Replies
38333 Views
Last post 08 February 2018, 04:50:06 PM
by Bahir
36 Replies
15919 Views
Last post 16 February 2022, 03:51:55 PM
by Easy E