Hm I've got a lot to consider still.
I've done a rough design of what boards I'm going to need. It'll be four 2x4 boards and 6 2x2 boards, with a mix of river, road and open field. Obviously I won't be needing to make them all straight away. At a later date I'll do some with hills, but that will be way off in the future. To start off I want roads and a river (plus a little ditch / stream that runs off one of the river boards), with one section where they cross at a ford.
I know that just using 2x2 boards will make warping less of an issue, but I'm going to have some 2x4 boards for two reasons.
1) It will mean less gridlines on the battlefield. I will be trying my hardest to make the joins seamless, but know I can only do it so well. I want to have as few seams visible as possible when they are not needed. Hence I can put together a battlefield with three 2x4 boards rather than a grid of 6 2x2 boards.
2) It will mean I won't be so tied to the rivers and roads bending at right angles. In particular I will have one long 2x4 river section that will have a gentle, natural curve, and one 2x4 road section with a nice meander to it.
Warping and boards joins will be my biggest obstacle though, and a nightmare if it goes wrong.
I'm still debating over MDF thickness. I could well make some battens to strengthen it all. That should mean I could use a thinner MDF layer..... 15mm foam, 6mm MDF and battens to keep it all together. Right?
I might change my mind and go for a thicker foam layer, but I think 15mm is all I need. It means my river won't have big steep banks, but that's fine. I'm also weighing up price and storage issues. If I go for a thicker foam layer I will be getting far less tiles for the same price and it could almost double the storage space I'll need.
Battens will mean they need a little more storage space though....
Has anyone ever considered a 'frame' or sorts to keep all the boards tight together? It will also mean I won't need one big tabletop to put them on, which is a huge issue. I'm really thinking I might do this. I don't have a big table or masses of roomspace, I'm going to be using 2 or 3 sturdy folding tables, but can't really rely on them for the boards to rest perfectly level on. They will need
another tabletop of sorts on top, and that will need to disassemble for easy storage. What I'm thinking is a series of 4 foot 'planks' bolted to two long 8 foot side pieces, all to be unbolted and stored under the bed or whatever. That can rest on the folding tables, and if done right should let the terrain boards sit inside perfectly. What do you think?
As to hiding the joins.... Obviously stopping warpage, a level surface and clean edges will be the three things to make sure I get it right. Does anyone have any words of wisdom on the matter? I've been looking at all sorts of amazing terrain board builds, here, on youtube, on blogs... And even the best looking of them still have very visible joins, which is kind of disheartening.
However... Anyone who looks at the Perry bros' facebook page will know they regular post pics of games they play on their fantastic boards. They obviously have a huge collection, covering many years, I think I remember seeing some of these same boards in the pages of White Dwarf back in the 90s. They don't seem to have any problem with visible joins.... Look at this picture. The slightly different colours of all the boards give it the 'patchwork' look, the actual joins are rather seamless.... Do you think they cover them up with flock, or is it just because they are built properly?

If anyone thinks they've done a good job of hiding joins on their boards, and have some pics, I'd love to see them!!!!