Historical Wargaming Survey

[redeaston]

Done

[CorvetteK225]

Good survey questions. 

I can only speak for myself, but:

The only one I had difficulty with was on the last page about figures, to me, sculpt quality and period accuracy are on equal par both being no.2, coming in close behind range completeness [no.1]. Together, they are a trifecta of bliss!. A quality sculpt, in my definition means both defined in detailed and limited mold lines/flashing. Take Battlefront for instance, their figure quality has dropped considerably with incomplete mold fills, heavy flashing, and poor castings common to many vehicles; all causing many to wonder, what happened to the company of 10+ years ago?! Price is not so much a factor with me, unless, it is insane pricing like the current consumer concerns about G[reed]W[orkshop]. I will gladly pay for quality figures like those sculpted by (Paul Hicks, Perry Bros., Richard Ansell, etc., etc.).

Good luck with your project!

David

[warlord frod]

I participated and found the survey well written. Will we get to see the tabulated results?

[Conquistador]

I participated and found the survey well written. Will we get to see the tabulated results?

Yes, I would like to compare them to surveys in the past.

Gracias,

Glenn

[vonplutz]

Once this has run its course we will give the results to those interested.

[HerbyF]

At work so I have plenty of time.     Done.

[carlos13th]

I would have put sengoku Japan as my preferred period even though it's not very well represented rules wise it seems.

Nice survey though.m