*

Recent Topics

Author Topic: Warhammer Historicals.. How Good Were They?  (Read 3626 times)

Offline Wellington

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 293
Re: Warhammer Historicals.. How Good Were They?
« Reply #15 on: 29 January 2021, 11:21:22 AM »
I played WAB a lot and enjoyed the Historical Weekends in Nottingham, even the desatrous HYW Campaign (desatrous for the English and Allies)  lol . Some of the books were real jewels like the Age of Arthur and El Cid by James. Others like the Byzantine book were very unbalanced and the Charior Wars and Age of Chivalry were just terrible.

The WAB 2.0 Rules were a real improvemnt, but the old supplements didn't realy work with the new rules. But now WAB is realy outdated, IGOYGO rules and the full control over the army is much to 20th century. I no longer play it.

LOTOW and LOTHS were fun too, we played it a lot. Only the ship rules for LOTHS didn't work at all. Horrible!

Travalgar works well if you are not to pedantic concerning naval warfare, but I undsertand if people hate it. Its very similar to Black Sea from Warlords.
A life without Samurai is possible, but not desirable!

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
46 Replies
13611 Views
Last post 21 June 2010, 07:45:09 AM
by marko.oja
18 Replies
3724 Views
Last post 10 April 2012, 02:20:37 AM
by jackwrench
8 Replies
4616 Views
Last post 10 August 2012, 06:22:24 AM
by Blackwolf
3 Replies
1693 Views
Last post 24 January 2017, 06:11:43 PM
by nic-e
4 Replies
1259 Views
Last post 05 May 2021, 06:23:57 AM
by BZ