*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 25, 2024, 08:22:02 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Donate

We Appreciate Your Support

Recent

Author Topic: Warhammer Historicals.. How Good Were They?  (Read 2846 times)

Offline Wellington

  • Scientist
  • Posts: 292
Re: Warhammer Historicals.. How Good Were They?
« Reply #15 on: January 29, 2021, 11:21:22 AM »
I played WAB a lot and enjoyed the Historical Weekends in Nottingham, even the desatrous HYW Campaign (desatrous for the English and Allies)  lol . Some of the books were real jewels like the Age of Arthur and El Cid by James. Others like the Byzantine book were very unbalanced and the Charior Wars and Age of Chivalry were just terrible.

The WAB 2.0 Rules were a real improvemnt, but the old supplements didn't realy work with the new rules. But now WAB is realy outdated, IGOYGO rules and the full control over the army is much to 20th century. I no longer play it.

LOTOW and LOTHS were fun too, we played it a lot. Only the ship rules for LOTHS didn't work at all. Horrible!

Travalgar works well if you are not to pedantic concerning naval warfare, but I undsertand if people hate it. Its very similar to Black Sea from Warlords.
A life without Samurai is possible, but not desirable!

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
46 Replies
12899 Views
Last post June 21, 2010, 07:45:09 AM
by marko.oja
18 Replies
3096 Views
Last post April 10, 2012, 02:20:37 AM
by jackwrench
8 Replies
3936 Views
Last post August 10, 2012, 06:22:24 AM
by Blackwolf
3 Replies
1279 Views
Last post January 24, 2017, 06:11:43 PM
by nic-e
4 Replies
1014 Views
Last post May 05, 2021, 06:23:57 AM
by BZ