*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 06, 2024, 02:54:00 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Donate

We Appreciate Your Support

Recent

Author Topic: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread  (Read 1742807 times)

Offline Diakon

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 866
  • Fancy a Battlefight?
    • My Blog - Tales From The Lead Pile
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3090 on: June 17, 2015, 05:10:15 PM »
If it all goes well I hope they consider doing something similar with 4ok too. One of my biggest gripes with modern 40k is the amount of miniatures I have to transport across to my friends house on games night.

As an example my friend recently fielded a blood angels army which included of 4 ten man Tactical squads. At 1500 points. In the old days of 2nd edition (where I started) a ten man Tactical Squad was a solid rock to build your army around. And that would be at 3000 points. A 3000 point Space Marine army would probably consist of 40-50 models. About the same amount of models would cost you 800-900 points now.

Offline Momotaro

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1320
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3091 on: June 17, 2015, 05:42:07 PM »
'Cos we've all heard the rumours that 9th ed is going to be a skirmish game set in various bubble universes, but I've just read a loong sneak peek that, while still just a rumour (with a bit of reliable backup), brings home just how drastic the changes might be. .

You know, the new game doesn't sound bad at all from that post.  Full stats for existing units, hopefully a solid ruleset underneath it all, who knows?  Could be good...

Some really stupid names in there though, and waaaay too much fluff - I can do that myself thank you!

ANd as you said, bugger all to do with the past 30 years of WFB...
« Last Edit: June 17, 2015, 08:25:23 PM by Momotaro »

Offline Major_Gilbear

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 3153
  • God-Emperor of Dune
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3092 on: June 18, 2015, 09:25:50 AM »
Well games size (number of models) is clearly an issue... In 40k I can field an complete battle company of marines for 1850pts!

The other issue I've increasingly noticed is... A bit more sensitive I guess. That is, as model count has gone up, painting quality (and indeed, instances of fully painted units or armies) has gone down. I personally do struggle with painting lots of models, so I can easily telegraph my own experiences to see why even full assembly of models (including removal of mould lines and such) is something that is a noteworthy goal in its own right. Getting vast numbers of models "done" is higher on the agenda than doing a nicer job for many, and that seems to me to be counter to one of the things that people have historically cited as a key reason why they like WHFB or 40k (that is, the spectacle of lovingly-painted forces clashing in combat on an attractive tabletop).

I don't think that changing WHFB is going to bring back those players who've gone over to other games like WM/H or Infinity really. Aesthetics and nostalgia are powerful motivators, but the longevity of a game/franchise is in the pleasure to be had from modelling, painting, and playing; the first two GW refuses to compete on, and the latter GW refuses to acknowledge as a problem. So even if AOS is rather different from anything GW has done before, I still don't think it will be enough to bring those players back.

Where AOS has more opportunity is in capturing those who are new players - either new to WHFB, to GW, or to wargaming in general. However, looking at LOTR panned out (which shared a lot of the same circumstances as AOS is facing in terms of target audience), I won't hold my breath.

Offline Argonor

  • Elder God
  • Posts: 11336
  • Attic Attack: Mead and Dice!
    • Argonor's Wargames
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3093 on: June 18, 2015, 04:16:46 PM »
one of the things that people have historically cited as a key reason why they like WHFB or 40k (that is, the spectacle of lovingly-painted forces clashing in combat on an attractive tabletop).


Isn't that true for ALL miniature wargames players??
Ask at the LAF, and answer shall thy be given!


Cultist #84

Offline Vermis

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2433
    • Mini Sculpture
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3094 on: June 18, 2015, 04:54:13 PM »
You know, the new game doesn't sound bad at all from that post.  Full stats for existing units, hopefully a solid ruleset underneath it all, who knows?  Could be good...

Some really stupid names in there though, and waaaay too much fluff - I can do that myself thank you!

Y'know what, I don't disagree. :) My interest was piqued at the mention of alternate activation, for one thing, and any kind of smaller model count has got to be good at GW's prices. (Though the fluff leaves me cold) I'm just banging my head, for the umpteenth time, against the brick wall of the 'stay GW, stay current, or die' attitude that many GW gamers have, encouraged by GW, who've now pulled the rug out from under them.

Maybe I should just worry about meself, and the games I can get in, but it's like walking past hundreds of people trying their best to push open doors that say 'pull' above the handle.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2015, 08:59:56 PM by Vermis »

Offline Major_Gilbear

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 3153
  • God-Emperor of Dune
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3095 on: June 19, 2015, 08:54:37 AM »
one of the things that people have historically cited as a key reason why they like WHFB or 40k (that is, the spectacle of lovingly-painted forces clashing in combat on an attractive tabletop).
Isn't that true for ALL miniature wargames players??

Well yes, but it's much easier to achieve when:

1) You have fewer models to paint

2) You don't have to keep changing the models you've finished every few years because of new editions/army books/basing rules/etc.

Plus, other games can claim well-written rules, quick and in-depth gameplay, and a whole host of other things that don't apply to WHFB. Therefore, the visual spectacle of playing with a few hundred painted figures between you is considered a particular highlight of that game rather than a normal expectation for pretty much any other game.

Anyway, I'll wait and see what 9E brings; as I said, I don't hold much hope, but I'm prepared to be pleasantly surprised (!).

Offline Vladimir Raukov

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 559
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3096 on: June 19, 2015, 12:11:03 PM »
The more that I learn about this, the more I flip between 'this could be kinda cool' and 'nope, nope, so much nope.' Whatever happens happens though.

Offline beefcake

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 7467
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3097 on: June 19, 2015, 12:28:00 PM »
Either way it will be very expensive.


Offline Vladimir Raukov

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 559
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3098 on: June 19, 2015, 12:30:15 PM »
I thought that went without saying, personally.

Offline Nord

  • Mad Scientist
  • Posts: 970
    • Nord's Painting Saga
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3099 on: June 19, 2015, 01:18:09 PM »
The biggest clue in to how it will pan out, in my mind at least, comes from GW themselves. Take a look at their releases for 40k, and for the End Times campaign. Substitute in the name Sigmar. Voila! The future.

Offline Major_Gilbear

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 3153
  • God-Emperor of Dune
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3100 on: June 19, 2015, 01:23:19 PM »
The biggest clue in to how it will pan out, in my mind at least, comes from GW themselves. Take a look at their releases for 40k, and for the End Times campaign. Substitute in the name Sigmar. Voila! The future.

...Yep.  :'(

Offline beefcake

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 7467
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3101 on: June 19, 2015, 08:59:17 PM »
I thought that went without saying, personally.
lol yep.

Offline zemjw

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • *
  • Posts: 2145
    • My blog
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3102 on: June 25, 2015, 09:11:28 AM »
They've released an Android version of their Games Workshop app.

Seems to be pretty much all ads from the comments (to be expected, but still disappointing), and the links all seem to point you to the itunes store to buy books etc.

I would have thought a decent RSS feed would have been more useful, but presumably that's so last year :-[

Offline zemjw

  • Supporting Adventurer
  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • *
  • Posts: 2145
    • My blog
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3103 on: June 26, 2015, 04:07:42 PM »
Mars Alpha Pattern Warlord Titan up for pre-order at ForgeWorld

The thing is massive, but I suppose the logic is that if you can afford it, you can afford a table big enough to hold it.

£1240.00 resin kit. But, hey, at least it's not limited edition  ;D

Offline Timbor

  • Mastermind
  • Posts: 1404
Re: The LAF Games Workshop Discussion Thread
« Reply #3104 on: June 26, 2015, 05:14:04 PM »
Preview pics of the new human and chaos figures in the 9th ed WFB starter set have leaked on the interwebz.  Without posting them here, I will state that 40k and fantasy now have the same esthetic, basically.
Paint log - leadadventureforum.com/index.php?topic=36840.0

Blog - My life in Millimetres

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
73 Replies
20287 Views
Last post June 20, 2008, 06:41:42 PM
by TJSKI
26 Replies
16231 Views
Last post January 18, 2015, 10:23:57 AM
by Arlequín
250 Replies
91197 Views
Last post June 19, 2015, 03:11:30 AM
by syrinx0
146 Replies
22720 Views
Last post February 08, 2018, 04:50:06 PM
by Bahir
36 Replies
6350 Views
Last post February 16, 2022, 03:51:55 PM
by Easy E