Encounter an error? Report it directly!
I do TOTALLY agree with you that they need to assume more responsibility, even if its just ratings, to weed out or evaluate KS projects. I think that if people are not held, or at least potentially held liable for their KS project, we'll have more of the Cthulu/Monopoly fiasco, or the latest one with the video game.
Well, c'est la vie innit? It's why programmes like 'Dragon's Den' and the whole concept of the business pitch exist, because people with good ideas sometimes don't have the capital or nous to get them off the ground. It doesn't stop established businesses having to pitch their own ideas, either to outside backers or to their own boardroom, in order to get the cash and/or spread the risk. A rookie entrepreneur is always going to be flying by the seat of their pants in a high risk/high reward game. I've always worked (on a business level) on the principle of honesty without overloading the customer with irrelevant information (judgement call on that) and trying to maintain a business relationship instead of a friendship. Now that's not to say that some of my business contacts aren't considered friends by me, it's just that I try to put an invisible prophylactic between informal and formal interactions. Perhaps that make me robotic and a tad artificial sounding sometimes, but I do find it helps to separate things and seems to be appreciated. I also try to under-promise in order to over-achieve, or at least avoid disappointment if things go awry. I'm still unsure as to the safeguards for a KS backer. Are there any at all? Some people seem to be saying you can claim your money back for a failed venture, some people seem to be saying you can't. Are there conditions? is it legally enforceable or still a grey area?Personally the only one I've backed (or felt like backing) was the Redbox Games Njorns one, and that's because I've dealt with Tre Manor before, trust him and love his work. This despite the fact that his previous KS ventures didn't go as planned, because shit happens sometimes.
One thing to keep in mind is that there's a very crucial difference between winning a lawsuit and actually collecting.
To your credit, you're thinking like someone with a vested interest in remaining a fully functioning member of society and not like a scofflaw happy to take the money and run. Liens cost money. Very few people will bother once it comes to that and they've seen they wont get a dime. In my former line of work I constantly observed saw the small time scammers who spend their lives living on ill-gotten gains. They rarely have a cent to their names to claim. Even when they do have a house or car of their own, it'll be in someone else's name, all perfectly legal and on paper they're little more than squatters aided by sympathetic family or friends. Now, I expect that failed Kickstarters are the result of incompetence far more often than not (though there certainly have been some real scams on KS), but in that case it's often young folks without assets. The end result is the same: They have nothing to collect. People win all sorts of judgments all the time in Small Claims Courts. Whether they actually get anything for their trouble or not is a very different matter. As for a bad reputation sticking to a repeat offender, well, you can always delegate someone else to be your project lead or simply obfuscate. That's been done plenty of times too. Scammers are professionals at finding loopholes or changing their information enough to keep going - that's their real job.
I find different crooks have their different specialties.
Milk Bar Owner??Gracias,Glenn
Started by Captain Blood Season 3
Started by David The Great War
Started by robh Post-Apocalyptic Tales
Started by Khurasan Miniatures Future Wars
Started by Andrew Rae Fantasy Adventures