*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 20, 2024, 06:09:39 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Donate

We Appreciate Your Support

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 1689767
  • Total Topics: 118294
  • Online Today: 786
  • Online Ever: 2235
  • (October 29, 2023, 01:32:45 AM)
Users Online

Recent

Author Topic: Newer GW inks separating  (Read 2683 times)

Offline Elbows

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 9465
Re: Newer GW inks separating
« Reply #15 on: February 15, 2023, 01:36:58 AM »
I haven't tried them, but ProAcryl recently put out a couple of washes --- and people like their paints (I had a few misses, but I think they make a good product).  I've been meaning to check them out.  They've been mimicking GW's paint line, so I assume the washes would be aimed at copying Agrax, etc.

https://monumenthobbies.com/collections/washes

PS: Whoops, one of the reviews says "stains less than other washes"? :D
2024 Painted Miniatures: 203
('23: 159, '22: 214, '21: 148, '20: 207, '19: 123, '18: 98, '17: 226, '16: 233, '15: 32, '14: 116)

https://myminiaturemischief.blogspot.com
Find us at TurnStyle Games on Facebook!

Offline Silent Invader

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 9658
Re: Newer GW inks separating
« Reply #16 on: February 15, 2023, 03:58:37 AM »
Yeah - that's why I use the acrylic inks that are noted as being UV stable. It should be noted that translucency and light-fastness do vary by colour though (link).

That is extremely useful - thank you.
My LAF Gallery is HERE
Minis (foot & mounted) finished in 2024 = 32
(2023 = 151; 2022 = 204; 2021 = 123; 2020 = ???)

Offline Major_Gilbear

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 3153
  • God-Emperor of Dune
Re: Newer GW inks separating
« Reply #17 on: February 15, 2023, 09:52:28 AM »
What can a man who relied on the "magic in a pot" that the older incarnations of these washes provided get instead, I ask?
[...]
I sure miss Devlan Mud.

In case my earlier comment wasn't enough for you, this blog article may be of interest to you.  ;)


That is extremely useful - thank you.
No problem! I had some difficulties myself trying to match the old GW "bolter shell" screw-top Turquoise ink, and the DR FW Acrylic ink is all I could find in the end that was a light-fast non-reactivating ink.



Offline Gibby

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 2354
Re: Newer GW inks separating
« Reply #18 on: February 15, 2023, 04:20:50 PM »
In case my earlier comment wasn't enough for you, this blog article may be of interest to you.  ;)

Cheers! :D

Interestingly, I have these washes but rarely use them!  lol

Offline Silent Invader

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 9658
Re: Newer GW inks separating
« Reply #19 on: March 07, 2023, 10:20:36 AM »
Thinks to the helpful posts above I’m trying out the DR FW Acrylic Ink



The DR is perhaps a little thick so I ended up adding a few drops of water to it.

At the mo I’m painting 15 minis in similar in this colour scheme, 5 Infinity metals and 10 WotC plastics,and it will be interesting to see how highlighting goes.

I’ll try to remember to retake the images when the shade has dried.
« Last Edit: March 07, 2023, 10:23:10 AM by Silent Invader »

Offline Major_Gilbear

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 3153
  • God-Emperor of Dune
Re: Newer GW inks separating
« Reply #20 on: March 07, 2023, 10:48:09 AM »
To make the DR ink behave like a wash, you need to add a little water and some matte acrylic medium to it.
Instead, if you have some (or are feeling flush/lazy) you could add some AP Wash Mixing Medium, or some Citadel Contrast Medium, which are basically pre-mixed versions of the same additives.

I also found it useful to let the DR settle out for a few weeks and then pour off the clear liquid to use - it loses a bit of colour strength, but increases transparency.

Offline Silent Invader

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 9658
Re: Newer GW inks separating
« Reply #21 on: March 07, 2023, 11:05:30 AM »
Thanks I’ll order some of the AP that I’ll try with the next attempt.

Presumably the medium is what gives the citadel wash the ‘smoother’ coat.

Offline Major_Gilbear

  • Scatterbrained Genius
  • Posts: 3153
  • God-Emperor of Dune
Re: Newer GW inks separating
« Reply #22 on: March 07, 2023, 01:21:13 PM »
Yes, exactly - it's a bit like "blank" paint essentially.

I sometimes use a little bit of drying retarder too; but the Vallejo stuff is so thick, it needs to be cut in a ratio of 1:5 with water to leave it usable - and a few drops of the diluted result into your bottle of home-made wash is all you need.

The retarder helps to give the wash enough time to settle fully before it begins to dry, and that reduces incidence of tide marks. It does of course mean that the stuff takes longer to dry as well though... So I use it very sparingly as a result, since otherwise the wash takes forever to dry.

Really, it's not hard to make your own version of all these washes and Contrast paints, but you need to have a critical mass of stuff to make them with first, and you also need to note down what you mix for future reference. After that, making up a bottle is simple enough, and you can always make more.

Not as quick as just buying the paint of course, and some washes and Contrasts do have their own specific desirable properties anyway (strength of tint usually).
« Last Edit: March 07, 2023, 01:23:49 PM by Major_Gilbear »

Offline Silent Invader

  • Galactic Brain
  • Posts: 9658
Re: Newer GW inks separating
« Reply #23 on: March 07, 2023, 02:22:30 PM »
Thanks again, your advice has been very helpful

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
8 Replies
2965 Views
Last post January 11, 2012, 12:40:37 AM
by Damien
4 Replies
1360 Views
Last post April 05, 2012, 09:24:58 PM
by blackstone
5 Replies
1550 Views
Last post June 30, 2012, 05:30:07 PM
by sbrndf11
6 Replies
1243 Views
Last post October 15, 2014, 07:24:00 AM
by maxxon
13 Replies
1584 Views
Last post June 28, 2022, 12:53:47 PM
by fitterpete