Well I don't really see any 'super-periods' in play at the moment (think the hey-day of bandwagon periods like Darkest Africa, Pirates and VBCW... )
Frostgrave certainly seems to be making a splash, although that's not really a period - just a product.
The Saga-driven resurgence of interest in The Dark Ages seems to be on the wane.
The boost given to medieval by Lion Rampant still seems to be rolling.
Several new competing WW2 rule sets appear to be keeping that period as popular as ever.
For me personally, I could get into almost anything that isn't Ancients, Napoleonics, WW2 / moderns, and fantasy.
I think perhaps because when I first started wargaming as a lad, all those years ago, these were pretty much the ONLY wargaming periods, and I got utterly sick to death of them.
So since I 'returned' to wargaming, modelling and painting about 15 years ago (after a 15 year break), the last thing I wanted to do was play big boring battles in these turgid 'mainstream' periods.
The only era I've stuck with through it all is ECW. I still collect and paint the occasional new ECW model to add to my collection. But I never play with them.
But ECW was always something of a minority interest, even back in the day...
My current efforts range across cavemen, Arthurians / early Saxons, Game of Thrones, Wars of The Roses (yes - still!), and a little late C17th.
But in the background I have figure collections (and occasional games) of swashbucklers / border reivers, pirates, pulp, NW Frontier / Zulus, Future Wars, feudals, Napoleonic landing parties, F&IW and so on.
All genres which chime with the 'adventure' gaming / large scale skirmish ethos and approach of LAF... Which I guess is why I like LAF so much

The idea of going back to moving big blocks of ancient or Napoleonic toy soldiers (or tanks for that matter) around the table top using a great fat rule-book makes me want to slit my wrists.
